PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTMF vs. EPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTMF vs. EPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than EPI's -10.02% return. Over the past 10 years, WTMF has underperformed EPI with an annualized return of 3.26%, while EPI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.98% annualized return.


WTMF

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.05%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.44%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
3.26%

EPI

1D
-1.40%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
-10.02%
6M
-8.12%
1Y
-9.55%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTMF vs. EPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
8.50%12.17%3.20%16.72%-6.52%9.48%0.48%-2.75%0.24%-3.40%
EPI
WisdomTree India Earnings Fund
-10.02%2.25%10.70%26.03%-4.74%26.41%18.55%1.53%-9.88%39.14%

Correlation

The correlation between WTMF and EPI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2011

0.06

The correlation between WTMF and EPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WTMF vs. EPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WTMF
EPI

Industrials

17.7%
9.7%

Technology

17.0%
8.3%

Healthcare

16.5%
5.5%

Financial Services

15.8%
23.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
7.5%

Real Estate

6.1%
0.9%

Energy

6.1%
17.3%

Basic Materials

4.8%
13.5%

Utilities

2.9%
8.4%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
3.5%

Industrials

WTMF
17.7%
EPI
9.7%

Technology

WTMF
17.0%
EPI
8.3%

Healthcare

WTMF
16.5%
EPI
5.5%

Financial Services

WTMF
15.8%
EPI
23.4%

Consumer Cyclical

WTMF
8.4%
EPI
7.5%

Real Estate

WTMF
6.1%
EPI
0.9%

Energy

WTMF
6.1%
EPI
17.3%

Basic Materials

WTMF
4.8%
EPI
13.5%

Utilities

WTMF
2.9%
EPI
8.4%

Communication Services

WTMF
2.4%
EPI
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

WTMF
2.4%
EPI
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTMF vs. EPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTMF
WTMF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
WTMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

EPI
EPI Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTMF vs. EPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTMFEPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

0.90

+0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.61

-0.57

+6.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.08

-1.39

+26.47

WTMF vs. EPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the EPI Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMF and EPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTMFEPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

-0.64

+3.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.33

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.44

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.13

+0.02

Drawdowns

WTMF vs. EPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, smaller than the maximum EPI drawdown of -66.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and EPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTMFEPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-66.21%

+35.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.04%

-16.88%

+12.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.93%

-21.89%

+11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.21%

-21.89%

+8.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.99%

-50.29%

+34.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-17.83%

+17.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-18.65%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

6.87%

-5.97%

Volatility

WTMF vs. EPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is 1.61%, while WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that WTMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTMFEPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

4.86%

-3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

12.80%

-5.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.63%

14.94%

-6.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.46%

16.21%

-6.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.07%

20.35%

-12.28%

WTMF vs. EPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EPI's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTMF vs. EPI - Dividend Comparison

WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, while EPI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPI
WisdomTree India Earnings Fund
0.00%0.00%0.27%0.15%6.01%1.18%0.78%1.17%1.18%0.85%1.05%1.20%
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.80%3.04%3.57%4.74%5.29%14.71%0.47%1.63%3.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTMF and EPI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPI has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to WTMF (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMF dropped -30.79% vs EPI's -66.21%.

On 10-year performance, EPI leads with 8.98% vs 3.26% for WTMF. On fees, WTMF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, WTMF has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPI has performed better with a 8.98% return vs 3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTMF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPI.

WTMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.00% for EPI.

WTMF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while EPI is Asia Pacific Equities. WTMF tracks WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while EPI tracks WisdomTree India Earnings Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTMF and 0.84% for EPI.

WTMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTMF and EPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer