PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTMF vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTMF vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, WTMF has underperformed DHS with an annualized return of 3.26%, while DHS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.47% annualized return.


WTMF

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.05%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.44%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
3.26%

DHS

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
9.88%
6M
10.38%
1Y
20.55%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTMF vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
8.50%12.17%3.20%16.72%-6.52%9.48%0.48%-2.75%0.24%-3.40%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
9.88%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.41%11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between WTMF and DHS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2011

0.09

The correlation between WTMF and DHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.32 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WTMF vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WTMF
DHS

Industrials

17.7%
4.1%

Technology

17.0%
3.7%

Healthcare

16.5%
14.5%

Financial Services

15.8%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
5.0%

Real Estate

6.1%
2.8%

Energy

6.1%
9.4%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.2%

Utilities

2.9%
9.0%

Communication Services

2.4%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
18.7%

Industrials

WTMF
17.7%
DHS
4.1%

Technology

WTMF
17.0%
DHS
3.7%

Healthcare

WTMF
16.5%
DHS
14.5%

Financial Services

WTMF
15.8%
DHS
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

WTMF
8.4%
DHS
5.0%

Real Estate

WTMF
6.1%
DHS
2.8%

Energy

WTMF
6.1%
DHS
9.4%

Basic Materials

WTMF
4.8%
DHS
1.2%

Utilities

WTMF
2.9%
DHS
9.0%

Communication Services

WTMF
2.4%
DHS
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

WTMF
2.4%
DHS
18.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTMF vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTMF
WTMF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
WTMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTMF vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTMFDHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.35

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.61

3.28

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.08

12.04

+13.04

WTMF vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMF and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTMFDHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.06

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.77

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.59

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.41

-0.25

Drawdowns

WTMF vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTMFDHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-67.25%

+36.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.04%

-6.30%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.93%

-11.87%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.21%

-15.28%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.99%

-37.35%

+21.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-2.60%

+2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-9.55%

-8.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.71%

-0.81%

Volatility

WTMF vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is 1.61%, while WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that WTMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTMFDHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

2.88%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

7.32%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.63%

10.01%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.46%

13.89%

-4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.07%

16.08%

-8.01%

WTMF vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTMF vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than DHS's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.35%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.80%3.04%3.57%4.74%5.29%14.71%0.47%1.63%3.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTMF and DHS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHS has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to WTMF (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMF dropped -30.79% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 10-year performance, DHS leads with 9.47% vs 3.26% for WTMF. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, WTMF has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DHS has performed better with a 9.47% return vs 3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WTMF.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.80% for WTMF.

WTMF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. WTMF tracks WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTMF and 0.38% for DHS.

WTMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTMF and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer