WTMF vs. BWET
WTMF (WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTMF is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTMF returned 9.77%/yr vs 129.64%/yr for BWET. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTMF charges 0.65%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.
Performance
WTMF vs. BWET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 875.88% return.
WTMF
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.26%
BWET
- 1D
- 4.26%
- 1M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 875.88%
- 6M
- 735.56%
- 1Y
- 1,800.91%
- 3Y*
- 129.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTMF vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 8.50% | 12.17% | 3.20% | 8.36% |
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 875.88% | 96.22% | -39.21% | 15.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTMF and BWET is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023 | 0.02 |
The correlation between WTMF and BWET shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WTMF vs. BWET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WTMF
BWET
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
WTMF
BWET
-
Technology
WTMF
BWET
-
Healthcare
WTMF
BWET
-
Financial Services
WTMF
BWET
Consumer Cyclical
WTMF
BWET
-
Real Estate
WTMF
BWET
-
Energy
WTMF
BWET
-
Basic Materials
WTMF
BWET
-
Utilities
WTMF
BWET
-
Communication Services
WTMF
BWET
-
Consumer Defensive
WTMF
BWET
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTMF vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank
WTMF
BWET
WTMF vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTMF | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.96 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.61 | 59.51 | -53.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.08 | 158.07 | -132.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTMF | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 18.57 | -15.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.90 | -1.75 |
Drawdowns
WTMF vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and BWET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTMF | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -56.90% | +26.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.04% | -30.64% | +26.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.93% | -56.90% | +46.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -11.29% | +11.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -24.09% | +6.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 11.51% | -10.61% |
Volatility
WTMF vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is 1.61%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that WTMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTMF | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 33.96% | -32.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.84% | 88.49% | -81.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.63% | 98.35% | -89.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.46% | 70.45% | -60.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.07% | 70.45% | -62.38% |
WTMF vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTMF vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison
WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 2.80% | 3.04% | 3.57% | 4.74% | 5.29% | 14.71% | 0.47% | 1.63% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTMF and BWET have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWET has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to WTMF (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMF dropped -30.79% vs BWET's -56.90%.
On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 129.64% vs 9.77% for WTMF. On fees, WTMF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, WTMF has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 129.64% return vs 9.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTMF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.
WTMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.
WTMF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while BWET is Commodities. WTMF tracks WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTMF and 3.50% for BWET.
BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.57 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTMF and BWET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer