PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTLTX vs. PIAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTLTX vs. PIAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTLTX achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly lower than PIAMX's 1.55% return.


WTLTX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.28%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
7.52%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
4.68%

PIAMX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.08%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
7.58%
5Y*
4.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTLTX vs. PIAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WTLTX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund
1.15%7.97%5.53%12.16%-9.75%3.13%7.31%12.21%-2.42%
PIAMX
PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund
1.55%2.34%11.23%16.38%-10.93%7.82%9.05%11.77%-2.63%

Correlation

The correlation between WTLTX and PIAMX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2018

0.68

The correlation between WTLTX and PIAMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTLTX vs. PIAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTLTX
WTLTX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
WTLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
WTLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PIAMX
PIAMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PIAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PIAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTLTX vs. PIAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTLTXPIAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.22

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

0.93

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.90

2.79

+12.11

WTLTX vs. PIAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTLTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the PIAMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTLTX and PIAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTLTX vs. PIAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTLTX drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, which is greater than PIAMX's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTLTX and PIAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTLTXPIAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-18.15%

-20.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.76%

-3.75%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.12%

-6.17%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.35%

-13.92%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-2.33%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

1.25%

-0.89%

Volatility

WTLTX vs. PIAMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund (WTLTX) is 0.48%, while PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX) has a volatility of 0.58%. This indicates that WTLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTLTXPIAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

0.58%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.43%

2.43%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97%

3.12%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.32%

4.04%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.49%

4.22%

+0.27%

WTLTX vs. PIAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTLTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PIAMX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTLTX vs. PIAMX - Dividend Comparison

WTLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than PIAMX's 7.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIAMX
PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund
7.84%9.12%8.49%8.12%7.99%8.64%6.63%6.96%7.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTLTX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund
4.10%4.09%4.21%4.26%4.23%3.41%3.88%4.88%4.76%4.55%4.51%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTLTX and PIAMX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIAMX has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to WTLTX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTLTX dropped -38.46% vs PIAMX's -18.15%.

WTLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTLTX and PIAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer