PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTI2.DE vs. EMXC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTI2.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTI2.DE) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WTI2.DE having a 29.84% return and EMXC.DE slightly higher at 30.36%.


WTI2.DE

1D
-3.26%
1M
-13.44%
6M
21.10%
YTD
29.84%
1Y
48.93%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*

EMXC.DE

1D
-1.60%
1M
-12.60%
6M
21.10%
YTD
30.36%
1Y
49.32%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTI2.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WTI2.DE
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc
29.84%9.72%18.67%52.35%-38.83%26.63%57.60%15.65%
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
30.36%19.92%9.13%14.31%-13.59%17.56%2.25%-4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between WTI2.DE and EMXC.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2019

0.70

The correlation between WTI2.DE and EMXC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTI2.DE vs. EMXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTI2.DE
WTI2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WTI2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTI2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTI2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
WTI2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTI2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC.DE
EMXC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTI2.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTI2.DE) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTI2.DEEMXC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.51

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

12.15

-2.79

WTI2.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTI2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTI2.DE and EMXC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTI2.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTI2.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.18%, roughly equal to the maximum EMXC.DE drawdown of -40.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTI2.DE and EMXC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTI2.DEEMXC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.18%

-40.89%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.08%

-13.66%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.27%

-20.47%

-14.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.18%

-20.47%

-19.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.34%

-13.66%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-7.73%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

3.95%

+1.22%

Volatility

WTI2.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Acc (WTI2.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.86% compared to Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) at 9.94%. This indicates that WTI2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMXC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTI2.DEEMXC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.86%

9.94%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.23%

20.82%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.71%

23.00%

+6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.11%

16.71%

+10.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.58%

19.20%

+8.38%

WTI2.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTI2.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTI2.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTI2.DE nor EMXC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WTI2.DE and EMXC.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMXC.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WTI2.DE.

WTI2.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while EMXC.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. WTI2.DE tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence, while EMXC.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WTI2.DE and 0.15% for EMXC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTI2.DE and EMXC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer