PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTEL.L vs. XWTS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTEL.L vs. XWTS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Telecommunications UCITS ETF (WTEL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WTEL.L having a 3.74% return and XWTS.L slightly lower at 3.66%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WTEL.L having a 10.79% annualized return and XWTS.L not far ahead at 10.80%.


WTEL.L

1D
1.54%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
3.74%
6M
3.36%
1Y
25.46%
3Y*
26.97%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*
10.79%

XWTS.L

1D
1.04%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
3.66%
6M
3.22%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
26.85%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTEL.L vs. XWTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTEL.L
SPDR MSCI World Telecommunications UCITS ETF
3.74%28.84%35.03%47.06%-37.79%15.91%22.40%26.15%-9.97%6.61%
XWTS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C
3.66%28.97%34.65%47.43%-37.76%16.03%22.50%26.25%-10.06%6.43%

Correlation

The correlation between WTEL.L and XWTS.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.98

The correlation between WTEL.L and XWTS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

WTEL.L vs. XWTS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WTEL.L
XWTS.L

Communication Services

99.1%
96.6%

Technology

0.4%
1.9%

Real Estate

0.3%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
0.1%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Industrials

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

WTEL.L
99.1%
XWTS.L
96.6%

Technology

WTEL.L
0.4%
XWTS.L
1.9%

Real Estate

WTEL.L
0.3%
XWTS.L
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

WTEL.L
0.2%
XWTS.L
0.1%

Financial Services

WTEL.L
0.0%
XWTS.L

-

Healthcare

WTEL.L
0.0%
XWTS.L

-

Industrials

WTEL.L
0.0%
XWTS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

WTEL.L
0.0%
XWTS.L

-

Energy

WTEL.L
0.0%
XWTS.L

-

Basic Materials

WTEL.L

-

XWTS.L

-

Utilities

WTEL.L

-

XWTS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTEL.L vs. XWTS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTEL.L
WTEL.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
WTEL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTEL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTEL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
WTEL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTEL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XWTS.L
XWTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XWTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTEL.L vs. XWTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Telecommunications UCITS ETF (WTEL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTEL.LXWTS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.17

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

8.66

-0.23

WTEL.L vs. XWTS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTEL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the XWTS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTEL.L and XWTS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTEL.LXWTS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.69

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.57

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.60

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.61

+0.01

Drawdowns

WTEL.L vs. XWTS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTEL.L drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, roughly equal to the maximum XWTS.L drawdown of -44.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTEL.L and XWTS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTEL.LXWTS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.74%

-44.71%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.88%

-11.35%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-18.95%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.74%

-44.71%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.74%

-44.71%

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

-3.20%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.95%

-8.84%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.85%

+0.16%

Volatility

WTEL.L vs. XWTS.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Telecommunications UCITS ETF (WTEL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) at 4.13%. This indicates that WTEL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XWTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTEL.LXWTS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

4.13%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.76%

10.57%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

14.57%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

19.07%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.88%

17.97%

-0.09%

WTEL.L vs. XWTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTEL.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XWTS.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTEL.L vs. XWTS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTEL.L nor XWTS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, WTEL.L and XWTS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XWTS.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XWTS.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WTEL.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WTEL.L and 0.25% for XWTS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTEL.L and XWTS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer