PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTCH.AS vs. WHCS.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTCH.AS vs. WHCS.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc (WHCS.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WTCH.AS is traded in EUR, while WHCS.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WHCS.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTCH.AS achieves a 25.44% return, which is significantly higher than WHCS.AS's -2.00% return.


WTCH.AS

1D
-1.95%
1M
14.84%
YTD
25.44%
6M
23.94%
1Y
48.66%
3Y*
29.25%
5Y*
22.49%
10Y*
23.98%

WHCS.AS

1D
2.74%
1M
3.77%
YTD
-2.00%
6M
-1.43%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
0.68%
5Y*
4.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTCH.AS vs. WHCS.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WTCH.AS
SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF
25.44%8.41%43.39%49.09%-27.66%40.88%31.79%10.80%
WHCS.AS
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc
-2.00%2.08%1.08%0.44%2.58%29.69%3.78%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between WTCH.AS and WHCS.AS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between WTCH.AS and WHCS.AS has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTCH.AS vs. WHCS.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTCH.AS
WTCH.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
WTCH.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

WHCS.AS
WHCS.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
WHCS.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHCS.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHCS.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
WHCS.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHCS.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTCH.AS vs. WHCS.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc (WHCS.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTCH.ASWHCS.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.10

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

0.69

+2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.10

1.60

+6.51

WTCH.AS vs. WHCS.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTCH.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the WHCS.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTCH.AS and WHCS.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTCH.ASWHCS.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

0.51

+1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.33

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.43

+0.72

Drawdowns

WTCH.AS vs. WHCS.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTCH.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, which is greater than WHCS.AS's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTCH.AS and WHCS.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTCH.ASWHCS.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.28%

-25.69%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.67%

-10.69%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.06%

-22.29%

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.06%

-22.29%

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-9.52%

+7.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-5.76%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.96%

4.63%

+1.33%

Volatility

WTCH.AS vs. WHCS.AS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc (WHCS.AS) at 5.06%. This indicates that WTCH.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WHCS.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTCH.ASWHCS.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

5.06%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

10.29%

+4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.28%

14.52%

+5.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.45%

14.07%

+8.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.39%

16.22%

+5.17%

WTCH.AS vs. WHCS.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTCH.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than WHCS.AS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTCH.AS vs. WHCS.AS - Dividend Comparison

WTCH.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WHCS.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
WHCS.AS
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD Inc
1.08%1.05%1.04%1.15%1.08%1.08%1.20%0.10%
WTCH.AS
SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTCH.AS and WHCS.AS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WTCH.AS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WTCH.AS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WHCS.AS.

WTCH.AS is categorized as Technology Equities, while WHCS.AS is Health & Biotech Equities. WTCH.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while WHCS.AS tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WTCH.AS and 1.00% for WHCS.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTCH.AS and WHCS.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer