WTCH.AS vs. WATL.L
WTCH.AS (SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF) and WATL.L (Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - WTCH.AS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while WATL.L is a Water Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WTCH.AS returned 23.98%/yr vs 8.20%/yr for WATL.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTCH.AS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for WATL.L.
Performance
WTCH.AS vs. WATL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WTCH.AS is traded in EUR, while WATL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WATL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTCH.AS achieves a 25.44% return, which is significantly higher than WATL.L's 0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, WTCH.AS has outperformed WATL.L with an annualized return of 23.98%, while WATL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.20% annualized return.
WTCH.AS
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- 14.84%
- YTD
- 25.44%
- 6M
- 23.94%
- 1Y
- 48.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.25%
- 5Y*
- 22.49%
- 10Y*
- 23.98%
WATL.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 7.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.20%
WTCH.AS vs. WATL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTCH.AS SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF | 25.44% | 8.41% | 43.39% | 49.09% | -27.66% | 40.88% | 31.79% | 49.43% | 1.91% | 21.26% |
WATL.L Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist | 0.16% | 0.92% | 12.51% | 18.72% | -16.50% | 33.61% | 7.12% | 40.42% | -13.99% | 10.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTCH.AS and WATL.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WTCH.AS and WATL.L has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTCH.AS vs. WATL.L — Risk / Return Rank
WTCH.AS
WATL.L
WTCH.AS vs. WATL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS) and Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTCH.AS | WATL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.98 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | -0.22 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.10 | -0.51 | +8.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTCH.AS | WATL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | -0.19 | +2.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.41 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | 0.57 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.84 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
WTCH.AS vs. WATL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTCH.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, smaller than the maximum WATL.L drawdown of -36.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTCH.AS and WATL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTCH.AS | WATL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.28% | -36.04% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.67% | -10.20% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.06% | -16.08% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.06% | -24.69% | -5.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.28% | -36.04% | +4.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -9.01% | +6.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -5.52% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 4.29% | +1.67% |
Volatility
WTCH.AS vs. WATL.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L) at 3.28%. This indicates that WTCH.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WATL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTCH.AS | WATL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 3.28% | +3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | 9.01% | +5.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.28% | 11.65% | +8.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 14.70% | +7.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 16.42% | +4.97% |
WTCH.AS vs. WATL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTCH.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than WATL.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTCH.AS vs. WATL.L - Dividend Comparison
WTCH.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WATL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WATL.L Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist | 1.09% | 1.08% | 0.77% | 0.84% | 0.42% | 0.63% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 2.06% | 1.60% | 2.21% | 2.43% |
WTCH.AS SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTCH.AS and WATL.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTCH.AS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTCH.AS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WATL.L.
WTCH.AS is categorized as Technology Equities, while WATL.L is Water Equities. WTCH.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while WATL.L tracks S&P Global Water TR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WTCH.AS and 0.60% for WATL.L.
Find the right allocation for WTCH.AS and WATL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer