WTAI vs. GDMN
WTAI (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WTAI is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence & Innovation Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. WTAI is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTAI returned 28.96%/yr vs 54.79%/yr for GDMN. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
WTAI vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTAI achieves a 37.13% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -21.29% return.
WTAI
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- 6M
- 31.19%
- YTD
- 37.13%
- 1Y
- 64.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.11%
GDMN
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -4.40%
- 6M
- -30.05%
- YTD
- -21.29%
- 1Y
- 49.41%
- 3Y*
- 54.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.47M | $2.23M | $3.42M | |
| $14.96M | $17.61M | $14.18M |
WTAI vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTAI WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund | 37.13% | 34.83% | 6.53% | 46.32% | -42.27% | -0.18% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -21.29% | 237.09% | 28.23% | 12.97% | -14.62% | 6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTAI and GDMN is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021 | 0.25 |
The correlation between WTAI and GDMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WTAI vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WTAI
GDMN
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
WTAI
GDMN
-
Consumer Cyclical
WTAI
GDMN
-
Communication Services
WTAI
GDMN
-
Industrials
WTAI
GDMN
-
Financial Services
WTAI
GDMN
-
Utilities
WTAI
GDMN
-
Consumer Defensive
WTAI
GDMN
-
Basic Materials
WTAI
-
GDMN
Energy
WTAI
-
GDMN
-
Healthcare
WTAI
-
GDMN
-
Real Estate
WTAI
-
GDMN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTAI vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
WTAI
GDMN
WTAI vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund (WTAI) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WTAI | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.18 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 0.95 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 1.99 | +7.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WTAI vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTAI drawdown since its inception was -45.96%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTAI and GDMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTAI | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.96% | -52.82% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.61% | -52.02% | +24.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.83% | -52.02% | +20.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.35% | -48.33% | +30.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.54% | -19.85% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.13% | 24.95% | -17.82% |
Volatility
WTAI vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund (WTAI) has a higher volatility of 17.28% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) at 14.93%. This indicates that WTAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTAI | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.28% | 14.93% | +2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.77% | 49.31% | -15.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.89% | 65.05% | -27.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.74% | 48.34% | -15.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.74% | 48.34% | -15.60% |
WTAI vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WTAI and GDMN have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
WTAI vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
WTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than GDMN's 3.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 3.43% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% |
WTAI WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund | 1.32% | 1.81% | 0.19% | 0.24% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTAI and GDMN have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTAI has higher volatility (17.28%) compared to GDMN (14.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTAI dropped -45.96% vs GDMN's -52.82%.
On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 54.79% vs 28.96% for WTAI. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, GDMN has been the lower-risk option at 14.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 54.79% return vs 28.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTAI and GDMN have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.
GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 1.32% for WTAI.
WTAI is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while GDMN is Commodities.
WTAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTAI and GDMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer