PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSR vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSR vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Whitestone REIT (WSR) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSR achieves a 38.60% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's 11.07% return.


WSR

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.49%
YTD
38.60%
6M
41.24%
1Y
56.34%
3Y*
31.53%
5Y*
23.16%
10Y*
8.84%

CGDV

1D
-1.04%
1M
0.75%
YTD
11.07%
6M
10.39%
1Y
27.24%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSR vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WSR
Whitestone REIT
38.60%2.17%19.75%33.96%-16.00%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
11.07%25.50%20.10%28.81%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between WSR and CGDV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between WSR and CGDV has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSR vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSR
WSR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
WSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
WSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSR vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Whitestone REIT (WSR) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSRCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.41

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

2.81

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.71

13.07

+4.64

WSR vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSR Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSR and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSR vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSR drawdown since its inception was -63.62%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSR and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSRCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.62%

-21.82%

-41.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

-9.75%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.06%

-14.28%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-1.79%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.17%

-3.59%

-10.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.09%

+1.10%

Volatility

WSR vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Whitestone REIT (WSR) is 0.62%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that WSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSRCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

4.64%

-4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.67%

9.92%

+5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.00%

12.28%

+10.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.43%

15.57%

+10.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.35%

15.57%

+18.78%

Dividends

WSR vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

WSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than CGDV's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.18%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WSR
Whitestone REIT
2.93%3.89%3.47%3.91%4.85%4.22%7.53%7.67%9.30%7.91%8.59%9.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


WSR and CGDV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGDV has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to WSR (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSR dropped -63.62% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

WSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSR and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer