WSML vs. DRIV
WSML (iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both Global Equities funds - WSML tracks the MSCI World Small Cap Index while DRIV tracks the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WSML returned 29.90% vs 63.10% for DRIV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
WSML vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSML achieves a 16.08% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 28.00% return.
WSML
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 16.08%
- 6M
- 14.77%
- 1Y
- 29.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRIV
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- 28.00%
- 6M
- 26.75%
- 1Y
- 63.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- —
WSML vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WSML iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF | 16.08% | 29.10% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 28.00% | 40.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSML and DRIV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | 0.81 |
The correlation between WSML and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSML vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank
WSML
DRIV
WSML vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF (WSML) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WSML | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 4.72 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.21 | 14.22 | -3.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WSML vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSML drawdown since its inception was -10.70%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSML and DRIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSML | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.70% | -41.93% | +31.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -13.43% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.96% | +10.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -15.07% | +13.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 4.45% | -1.78% |
Volatility
WSML vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF (WSML) is 5.10%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 13.19%. This indicates that WSML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSML | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 13.19% | -8.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.22% | 22.93% | -10.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 27.77% | -12.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 27.61% | -9.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 27.64% | -9.82% |
Dividends
WSML vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
WSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than DRIV's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.58% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% |
WSML iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF | 2.78% | 2.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WSML and DRIV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRIV has higher volatility (13.19%) compared to WSML (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSML dropped -10.70% vs DRIV's -41.93%.
On 1-year performance, DRIV leads with 63.10% vs 29.90% for WSML. On volatility, WSML has been the lower-risk option at 5.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 63.10% return vs 29.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WSML has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.58% for DRIV.
WSML tracks MSCI World Small Cap Index, while DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X.
DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WSML and DRIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer