PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSML vs. DRIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSML vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF (WSML) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSML achieves a 16.08% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 28.00% return.


WSML

1D
0.17%
1M
1.26%
YTD
16.08%
6M
14.77%
1Y
29.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRIV

1D
2.20%
1M
-8.96%
YTD
28.00%
6M
26.75%
1Y
63.10%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSML vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WSML and DRIV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.81

The correlation between WSML and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSML vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSML
WSML Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
WSML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSML Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSML Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
WSML Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSML Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIV
DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSML vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF (WSML) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSMLDRIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

4.72

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

14.22

-3.01

WSML vs. DRIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSML Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the DRIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSML and DRIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSML vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSML drawdown since its inception was -10.70%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSML and DRIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSMLDRIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-41.93%

+31.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-13.43%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.96%

+10.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-15.07%

+13.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

4.45%

-1.78%

Volatility

WSML vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF (WSML) is 5.10%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 13.19%. This indicates that WSML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSMLDRIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

13.19%

-8.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.22%

22.93%

-10.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.52%

27.77%

-12.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

27.61%

-9.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.82%

27.64%

-9.82%

Dividends

WSML vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison

WSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than DRIV's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
0.58%1.07%2.07%1.62%1.24%0.32%0.29%1.23%2.79%
WSML
iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF
2.78%2.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WSML and DRIV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIV has higher volatility (13.19%) compared to WSML (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSML dropped -10.70% vs DRIV's -41.93%.

On 1-year performance, DRIV leads with 63.10% vs 29.90% for WSML. On volatility, WSML has been the lower-risk option at 5.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 63.10% return vs 29.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WSML has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.58% for DRIV.

WSML tracks MSCI World Small Cap Index, while DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X.

DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSML and DRIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer