PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSMDX vs. WBEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSMDX vs. WBEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (WSMDX) and William Blair Emerging Markets Growth Fund (WBEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSMDX achieves a 12.76% return, which is significantly lower than WBEIX's 35.23% return. Over the past 10 years, WSMDX has outperformed WBEIX with an annualized return of 12.51%, while WBEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.55% annualized return.


WSMDX

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.34%
YTD
12.76%
6M
11.01%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
12.51%

WBEIX

1D
0.70%
1M
7.51%
YTD
35.23%
6M
38.49%
1Y
63.42%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSMDX vs. WBEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WSMDX
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund
12.76%0.63%27.55%18.14%-22.98%8.28%32.38%30.81%-2.18%28.85%
WBEIX
William Blair Emerging Markets Growth Fund
35.23%25.18%10.62%10.23%-33.15%3.23%40.77%28.36%-21.31%48.82%

Correlation

The correlation between WSMDX and WBEIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2005

0.57

The correlation between WSMDX and WBEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSMDX vs. WBEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSMDX
WSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
WSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
WSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

WBEIX
WBEIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
WBEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
WBEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSMDX vs. WBEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (WSMDX) and William Blair Emerging Markets Growth Fund (WBEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WSMDXWBEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.55

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

4.62

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

17.09

-8.86

WSMDX vs. WBEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the WBEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSMDX and WBEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WSMDXWBEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

3.13

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.35

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.65

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.44

+0.10

Drawdowns

WSMDX vs. WBEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSMDX drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, smaller than the maximum WBEIX drawdown of -71.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSMDX and WBEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSMDXWBEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.33%

-71.18%

+20.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-14.04%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.63%

-19.64%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.89%

-40.95%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

-43.75%

+6.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

0.00%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-21.47%

+13.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.78%

-0.67%

Volatility

WSMDX vs. WBEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (WSMDX) is 5.53%, while William Blair Emerging Markets Growth Fund (WBEIX) has a volatility of 8.63%. This indicates that WSMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WBEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSMDXWBEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

8.63%

-3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

17.30%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

20.70%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.04%

16.72%

+6.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.93%

17.82%

+4.11%

WSMDX vs. WBEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSMDX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than WBEIX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

WSMDX vs. WBEIX - Dividend Comparison

WSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than WBEIX's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WBEIX
William Blair Emerging Markets Growth Fund
0.30%0.41%0.10%0.53%0.16%21.21%4.12%4.31%14.57%0.94%0.45%1.11%
WSMDX
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund
2.49%2.81%24.90%7.89%3.34%9.30%1.66%7.13%8.88%5.33%2.64%5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


WSMDX and WBEIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WBEIX has higher volatility (8.63%) compared to WSMDX (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSMDX dropped -50.33% vs WBEIX's -71.18%.

WBEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSMDX and WBEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer