WSMDX vs. FXAIX

In the year-to-date period, WSMDX achieves a -9.63% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's -0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, WSMDX has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 1.93%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.49% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WSMDX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (WSMDX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WSMDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSMDX and FXAIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WSMDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.

The maximum WSMDX drawdown since its inception was -52.67%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSMDX and FXAIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (WSMDX) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 6.30%. This indicates that WSMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.