PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSGE vs. QMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSGE vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Warren Street Global Equity ETF (WSGE) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSGE achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly lower than QMOM's 12.94% return.


WSGE

1D
0.16%
1M
0.07%
6M
8.66%
YTD
11.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

QMOM

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.80%
6M
8.63%
YTD
12.94%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
12.30%
ALL TIME*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.43M$1.49M$2.25M
$11.25K$8.63K$43.18K

WSGE vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WSGE and QMOM is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSGE vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WSGE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QMOM
QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WSGE vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Warren Street Global Equity ETF (WSGE) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSGEQMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

WSGE vs. QMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSGE vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSGE drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum QMOM drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSGE and QMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSGEQMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-39.13%

+29.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-9.73%

+8.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-12.83%

+11.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

Volatility

WSGE vs. QMOM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSGEQMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

25.74%

-10.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

24.46%

-9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.30%

26.72%

-11.42%

WSGE vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSGE has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than QMOM's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

WSGE vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison

WSGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than QMOM's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QMOM
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
0.48%0.54%1.40%0.87%1.59%0.12%0.08%0.01%0.05%0.13%0.34%
WSGE
Warren Street Global Equity ETF
0.24%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WSGE and QMOM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QMOM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QMOM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for WSGE.

QMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.24% for WSGE.

WSGE is categorized as Global Equities, while QMOM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for WSGE and 0.28% for QMOM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSGE and QMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer