WSDB vs. SJLD
WSDB (Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF) and SJLD (SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WSDB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SJLD.
Performance
WSDB vs. SJLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WSDB
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SJLD
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WSDB vs. SJLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WSDB Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF | 0.68% |
SJLD SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF | 1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSDB and SJLD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSDB vs. SJLD — Risk / Return Rank
WSDB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SJLD
WSDB vs. SJLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF (WSDB) and SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WSDB | SJLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.68 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 22.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WSDB vs. SJLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSDB drawdown since its inception was -0.56%, smaller than the maximum SJLD drawdown of -1.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSDB and SJLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSDB | SJLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -1.04% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.15% | -0.12% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.22% | — |
Volatility
WSDB vs. SJLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSDB | SJLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50% | 1.87% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.50% | 1.90% | -0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.50% | 1.90% | -0.40% |
WSDB vs. SJLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
WSDB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SJLD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WSDB vs. SJLD - Dividend Comparison
WSDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than SJLD's 4.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SJLD SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF | 4.41% | 3.74% | 1.26% |
WSDB Weitz Short Duration Bond ETF | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WSDB and SJLD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SJLD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SJLD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WSDB.
SJLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.80% for WSDB.
They also come from different issuers: Weitz and SanJac Alpha. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WSDB and 0.35% for SJLD.
Find the right allocation for WSDB and SJLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer