PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSCR.L vs. UC96.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSCR.L vs. UC96.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (WSCR.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSCR.L achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly higher than UC96.L's 5.73% return.


WSCR.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.46%
YTD
6.37%
6M
7.15%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
10.09%
5Y*
10Y*

UC96.L

1D
0.78%
1M
3.59%
YTD
5.73%
6M
6.22%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSCR.L vs. UC96.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WSCR.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
6.37%8.66%5.56%10.48%-8.17%1.32%
UC96.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
5.73%3.55%8.94%8.61%1.61%9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between WSCR.L and UC96.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2021

0.76

The correlation between WSCR.L and UC96.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

WSCR.L vs. UC96.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WSCR.L
UC96.L

Industrials

21.1%
19.5%

Financial Services

14.1%
18.7%

Technology

12.9%
21.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
4.0%

Healthcare

10.0%
19.0%

Real Estate

8.8%

-

Basic Materials

8.4%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
5.2%

Energy

4.0%
1.9%

Communication Services

3.2%
4.3%

Utilities

1.9%
0.5%

Industrials

WSCR.L
21.1%
UC96.L
19.5%

Financial Services

WSCR.L
14.1%
UC96.L
18.7%

Technology

WSCR.L
12.9%
UC96.L
21.1%

Consumer Cyclical

WSCR.L
11.2%
UC96.L
4.0%

Healthcare

WSCR.L
10.0%
UC96.L
19.0%

Real Estate

WSCR.L
8.8%
UC96.L

-

Basic Materials

WSCR.L
8.4%
UC96.L
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

WSCR.L
4.5%
UC96.L
5.2%

Energy

WSCR.L
4.0%
UC96.L
1.9%

Communication Services

WSCR.L
3.2%
UC96.L
4.3%

Utilities

WSCR.L
1.9%
UC96.L
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSCR.L vs. UC96.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSCR.L
WSCR.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
WSCR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSCR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSCR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
WSCR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSCR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

UC96.L
UC96.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
UC96.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC96.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC96.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UC96.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC96.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSCR.L vs. UC96.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (WSCR.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WSCR.LUC96.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

2.70

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

8.77

+0.04

WSCR.L vs. UC96.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSCR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the UC96.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSCR.L and UC96.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WSCR.LUC96.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.75

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.72

-0.40

Drawdowns

WSCR.L vs. UC96.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSCR.L drawdown since its inception was -22.10%, smaller than the maximum UC96.L drawdown of -27.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSCR.L and UC96.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSCR.LUC96.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.10%

-27.20%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-6.87%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.10%

-19.43%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

0.00%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-4.30%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.12%

+0.27%

Volatility

WSCR.L vs. UC96.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (WSCR.L) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) at 2.89%. This indicates that WSCR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC96.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSCR.LUC96.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

2.89%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

7.49%

+1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

10.71%

+1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.79%

14.04%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

15.95%

-0.16%

WSCR.L vs. UC96.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSCR.L has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than UC96.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WSCR.L vs. UC96.L - Dividend Comparison

WSCR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than UC96.L's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
UC96.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.01%0.01%0.01%0.78%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.01%
WSCR.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Small Cap Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.75%0.79%1.82%1.59%1.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WSCR.L and UC96.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WSCR.L is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WSCR.L is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC96.L.

WSCR.L is categorized as Global Equities, while UC96.L is Large Cap Value Equities. WSCR.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while UC96.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for WSCR.L and 0.25% for UC96.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSCR.L and UC96.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer