WRTH vs. OMAH

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

WRTH (Worth Charting Options Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WRTH charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

WRTH vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Worth Charting Options Income ETF (WRTH) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WRTH

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 1.48%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 2.11%
• 6M: 10.79%
• YTD: 10.88%
• 1Y: 16.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	$20.61M	$17.47M	$16.72M
WRTH Worth Charting Options Income ETF	$1.43M	$1.25M	$1.45M

WRTH vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WRTH Worth Charting Options Income ETF	3.57%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between WRTH and OMAH is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026	0.10

Return for Risk

WRTH vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WRTH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 83
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 77
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WRTH vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worth Charting Options Income ETF (WRTH) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WRTH	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.03	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.86	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.76	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.81	—

Drawdowns

WRTH vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRTH drawdown since its inception was -6.20%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRTH and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRTH	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.20%	-11.83%	+5.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.76%	0.00%	-4.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-1.22%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.23%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WRTH	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.91%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.81%	8.35%	+8.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.81%	12.82%	+3.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.81%	12.82%	+3.99%

WRTH vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRTH has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

WRTH vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

WRTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than OMAH's 14.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.83%	12.86%
WRTH Worth Charting Options Income ETF	1.61%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRTH and OMAH in my portfolio?

WRTH and OMAH have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WRTH or OMAH?

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WRTH or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for WRTH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WRTH or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 14.83%, compared with 1.61% for WRTH.

What is the main difference between WRTH and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Tidal and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for WRTH and 0.95% for OMAH.