WRTBY vs. XOM
WRTBY (Wartsila Oyj Abp ADR) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. WRTBY operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while XOM operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 10 years, WRTBY returned 0.75%/yr vs 8.48%/yr for XOM. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WRTBY vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRTBY achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 16.96% return. Over the past 10 years, WRTBY has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of 0.75%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.48% annualized return.
WRTBY
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -11.79%
- 6M
- -5.78%
- YTD
- -6.03%
- 1Y
- 46.58%
- 3Y*
- 50.08%
- 5Y*
- 21.31%
- 10Y*
- 0.75%
XOM
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- YTD
- 16.96%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.15%
- 5Y*
- 22.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
WRTBY vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRTBY Wartsila Oyj Abp ADR | -6.03% | 120.40% | 25.36% | 76.47% | -38.37% | 46.08% | -6.00% | -35.99% | -72.28% | 43.41% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 16.96% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRTBY and XOM is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2010 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
WRTBY:
$100.18B
XOM:
$575.42B
WRTBY:
€0.21
XOM:
$5.96
WRTBY:
27.97
XOM:
23.32
WRTBY:
0.60
XOM:
1.08
WRTBY:
2.54
XOM:
1.81
WRTBY:
7.37
XOM:
2.28
WRTBY:
€6.89B
XOM:
$326.01B
WRTBY:
€2.41B
XOM:
$83.11B
WRTBY:
€1.03B
XOM:
$60.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRTBY vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
WRTBY
XOM
WRTBY vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wartsila Oyj Abp ADR (WRTBY) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WRTBY | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.18 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.23 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.10 | 3.24 | +1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WRTBY vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRTBY drawdown since its inception was -98.10%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRTBY and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRTBY | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.10% | -62.40% | -35.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.24% | -20.11% | -8.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.90% | -20.11% | -12.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.84% | -20.51% | -36.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.10% | -61.34% | -36.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.09% | -18.46% | -65.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.86% | -10.22% | -43.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.55% | 7.65% | +1.90% |
Volatility
WRTBY vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
Wartsila Oyj Abp ADR (WRTBY) has a higher volatility of 10.79% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 7.89%. This indicates that WRTBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRTBY | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.79% | 7.89% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.33% | 20.76% | +12.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.81% | 24.73% | +24.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.74% | 26.71% | +25.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 386.38% | 28.25% | +358.13% |
Dividends
WRTBY vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
WRTBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than XOM's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRTBY Wartsila Oyj Abp ADR | 3.49% | 1.30% | 2.04% | 2.00% | 3.13% | 1.75% | 4.20% | 5.09% | 6.56% | 3.38% | 6.04% | 2.58% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.94% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
WRTBY vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wartsila Oyj Abp ADR and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WRTBY vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison
WRTBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Wartsila Oyj Abp ADR reported a gross profit of 1.56B and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
WRTBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Wartsila Oyj Abp ADR reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
WRTBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Wartsila Oyj Abp ADR reported a net income of 146.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WRTBY and XOM have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WRTBY has higher volatility (10.79%) compared to XOM (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRTBY dropped -98.10% vs XOM's -62.40%.
WRTBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WRTBY and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer