WRPIX vs. RYMQX
WRPIX (Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund) and RYMQX (Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, WRPIX returned 7.21%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RYMQX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WRPIX charges 0.72%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for RYMQX.
Performance
WRPIX vs. RYMQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRPIX achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than RYMQX's 5.25% return.
WRPIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 11.63%
- 1Y
- 20.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- —
RYMQX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 5.93%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- 1.74%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
WRPIX vs. RYMQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRPIX Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund | 10.67% | 5.37% | 11.23% | -0.06% | 10.44% | 6.84% | -16.77% | -2.86% |
RYMQX Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund | 5.25% | 1.58% | -3.59% | 4.26% | -3.47% | 7.17% | 7.40% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRPIX and RYMQX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2019 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRPIX vs. RYMQX — Risk / Return Rank
WRPIX
RYMQX
WRPIX vs. RYMQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund (WRPIX) and Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WRPIX | RYMQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.44 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.28 | 4.10 | +3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.51 | 13.98 | +11.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WRPIX | RYMQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06 | 2.22 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.05 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.20 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
WRPIX vs. RYMQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRPIX drawdown since its inception was -21.67%, smaller than the maximum RYMQX drawdown of -29.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRPIX and RYMQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRPIX | RYMQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.67% | -29.13% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -2.22% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.72% | -13.98% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.72% | -13.98% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -2.31% | +2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -8.89% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 0.65% | +0.15% |
Volatility
WRPIX vs. RYMQX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund (WRPIX) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX) at 0.69%. This indicates that WRPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYMQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRPIX | RYMQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 0.69% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.26% | 3.40% | +1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.65% | 4.11% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.13% | 5.68% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 5.29% | +1.79% |
WRPIX vs. RYMQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRPIX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than RYMQX's 1.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
WRPIX vs. RYMQX - Dividend Comparison
WRPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, less than RYMQX's 9.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYMQX Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund | 9.63% | 10.13% | 2.89% | 3.12% | 1.67% | 0.78% | 1.03% | 2.10% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.15% |
WRPIX Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund | 6.47% | 7.16% | 3.25% | 4.66% | 15.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WRPIX and RYMQX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WRPIX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to RYMQX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRPIX dropped -21.67% vs RYMQX's -29.13%.
WRPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WRPIX and RYMQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer