PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYMQX vs. SECUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYMQX vs. SECUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMQX achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly lower than SECUX's 14.97% return. Over the past 10 years, RYMQX has underperformed SECUX with an annualized return of 2.16%, while SECUX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.21% annualized return.


RYMQX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.76%
YTD
4.99%
6M
5.84%
1Y
8.80%
3Y*
1.65%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
2.16%

SECUX

1D
0.16%
1M
4.11%
YTD
14.97%
6M
15.86%
1Y
18.15%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
11.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYMQX vs. SECUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYMQX
Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund
4.99%1.58%-3.59%4.26%-3.47%7.17%7.40%4.79%-4.66%3.49%
SECUX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund
14.97%1.86%14.29%26.43%-28.33%13.39%31.95%32.44%-7.76%24.15%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMQX and SECUX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.45

The correlation between RYMQX and SECUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (10 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYMQX vs. SECUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYMQX
RYMQX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RYMQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SECUX
SECUX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SECUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SECUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECUX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYMQX vs. SECUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYMQXSECUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

1.15

+1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

1.72

+1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.21

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

1.98

+2.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.74

6.72

+7.02

RYMQX vs. SECUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the SECUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMQX and SECUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYMQXSECUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.15

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.26

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.53

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.27

-0.07

Drawdowns

RYMQX vs. SECUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMQX drawdown since its inception was -29.13%, smaller than the maximum SECUX drawdown of -71.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMQX and SECUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYMQXSECUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.13%

-71.68%

+42.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.22%

-9.17%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-25.43%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.98%

-37.80%

+23.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.98%

-38.56%

+24.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

0.00%

-2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-18.41%

+9.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

2.70%

-2.05%

Volatility

RYMQX vs. SECUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX) is 0.67%, while Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that RYMQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SECUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYMQXSECUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

4.35%

-3.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.40%

12.53%

-9.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

15.83%

-11.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

21.43%

-15.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.29%

21.18%

-15.89%

RYMQX vs. SECUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYMQX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SECUX's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYMQX vs. SECUX - Dividend Comparison

RYMQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.65%, while SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYMQX
Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund
9.65%10.13%2.89%3.12%1.67%0.78%1.03%2.10%0.16%0.00%0.15%0.00%
SECUX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.31%41.48%6.54%14.34%2.18%27.68%12.89%0.59%14.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYMQX and SECUX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SECUX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to RYMQX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMQX dropped -29.13% vs SECUX's -71.68%.

RYMQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYMQX and SECUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer