WRLD.AX vs. MNRS.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

WRLD.AX (Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF) and MNRS.AX (Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF) are both Global Equities funds from BetaShares. WRLD.AX is actively managed, while MNRS.AX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WRLD.AX returned 10.05%/yr vs 15.60%/yr for MNRS.AX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

WRLD.AX vs. MNRS.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF (WRLD.AX) and Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRLD.AX achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly higher than MNRS.AX's -17.80% return.

WRLD.AX

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 0.34%
• 6M: 2.17%
• YTD: 3.25%
• 1Y: 11.33%
• 3Y*: 15.69%
• 5Y*: 10.05%
• 10Y*: 9.87%

MNRS.AX

• 1D: -2.80%
• 1M: -17.06%
• 6M: -27.11%
• YTD: -17.80%
• 1Y: 38.63%
• 3Y*: 33.36%
• 5Y*: 15.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRLD.AX vs. MNRS.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WRLD.AX Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF	3.25%	9.59%	29.10%	13.20%	-10.32%	23.66%	-3.31%	22.48%	-0.50%	10.96%
MNRS.AX Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF	-17.80%	154.64%	16.03%	-0.92%	-8.42%	-8.79%	28.38%	53.58%	-7.67%	-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between WRLD.AX and MNRS.AX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2016	-0.05

The correlation between WRLD.AX and MNRS.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WRLD.AX vs. MNRS.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRLD.AX

WRLD.AX Risk / Return Rank: 40
WRLD.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
WRLD.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
WRLD.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
WRLD.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
WRLD.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

MNRS.AX

MNRS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 28
MNRS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
MNRS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MNRS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MNRS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
MNRS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRLD.AX vs. MNRS.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF (WRLD.AX) and Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WRLD.AX	MNRS.AX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	0.78	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.24	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.17	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	0.98	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.44	2.22	+1.22

WRLD.AX vs. MNRS.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRLD.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the MNRS.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRLD.AX and MNRS.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WRLD.AX vs. MNRS.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRLD.AX drawdown since its inception was -16.14%, smaller than the maximum MNRS.AX drawdown of -47.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRLD.AX and MNRS.AX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRLD.AX	MNRS.AX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.14%	-47.71%	+31.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.22%	-38.24%	+29.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.70%	-38.24%	+24.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.47%	-38.59%	+24.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.76%	-38.24%	+36.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.18%	-23.39%	+19.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.26%	17.14%	-13.88%

Volatility

WRLD.AX vs. MNRS.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF (WRLD.AX) is 2.21%, while Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX) has a volatility of 13.80%. This indicates that WRLD.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNRS.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRLD.AX	MNRS.AX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.21%	13.80%	-11.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.88%	41.64%	-34.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.95%	48.24%	-39.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.37%	34.24%	-22.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.01%	33.89%	-22.88%

Dividends

WRLD.AX vs. MNRS.AX - Dividend Comparison

WRLD.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRS.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MNRS.AX Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF	9.56%	0.15%	1.30%	0.00%	0.00%	3.25%	2.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WRLD.AX Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	4.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.66%	0.90%	0.00%	0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRLD.AX and MNRS.AX in my portfolio?

WRLD.AX and MNRS.AX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.