PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNRS.AX vs. EX20.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNRS.AX vs. EX20.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX) and Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF (EX20.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNRS.AX achieves a -15.43% return, which is significantly lower than EX20.AX's -6.84% return.


MNRS.AX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-11.41%
6M
-25.22%
YTD
-15.43%
1Y
39.76%
3Y*
34.79%
5Y*
16.26%
10Y*

EX20.AX

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.97%
6M
-8.41%
YTD
-6.84%
1Y
-2.67%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNRS.AX vs. EX20.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNRS.AX
Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
-15.43%154.64%16.03%-0.92%-8.42%-8.79%28.38%53.58%-7.67%-1.31%
EX20.AX
Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF
-6.84%14.21%10.11%6.68%-10.28%16.05%1.28%26.55%-6.17%18.94%

Correlation

The correlation between MNRS.AX and EX20.AX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2016

0.20

Over the past year, MNRS.AX and EX20.AX have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNRS.AX vs. EX20.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNRS.AX
MNRS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MNRS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNRS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNRS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MNRS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNRS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

EX20.AX
EX20.AX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EX20.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EX20.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
EX20.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
EX20.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
EX20.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNRS.AX vs. EX20.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX) and Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF (EX20.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNRS.AXEX20.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.99

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

-0.12

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.39

-0.28

+2.67

MNRS.AX vs. EX20.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNRS.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the EX20.AX Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNRS.AX and EX20.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNRS.AX vs. EX20.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNRS.AX drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, which is greater than EX20.AX's maximum drawdown of -39.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRS.AX and EX20.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNRS.AXEX20.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.71%

-39.55%

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.82%

-16.84%

-19.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.82%

-16.84%

-19.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.59%

-18.65%

-19.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.46%

-10.81%

-25.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.39%

-5.38%

-18.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.97%

7.57%

+9.40%

Volatility

MNRS.AX vs. EX20.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX) has a higher volatility of 13.92% compared to Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF (EX20.AX) at 4.15%. This indicates that MNRS.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EX20.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNRS.AXEX20.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.92%

4.15%

+9.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.61%

13.78%

+27.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.17%

16.49%

+31.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.23%

15.01%

+19.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.89%

15.89%

+18.00%

Dividends

MNRS.AX vs. EX20.AX - Dividend Comparison

MNRS.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than EX20.AX's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EX20.AX
Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF
1.63%3.52%1.46%1.71%1.44%1.80%2.68%4.51%3.89%1.20%
MNRS.AX
Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
9.30%0.15%1.30%0.00%0.00%3.25%2.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNRS.AX and EX20.AX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNRS.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while EX20.AX is Australian Equities. MNRS.AX tracks Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged Index, while EX20.AX tracks Solactive Australia ex 20 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNRS.AX and EX20.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer