PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRGCX vs. UMBHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WRGCX

1D
0.23%
1M
3.21%
YTD
12.81%
6M
11.03%
1Y
25.83%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
11.18%

UMBHX

1D
2.34%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WRGCX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRGCX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRGCX
WRGCX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
WRGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
WRGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WRGCXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.95

WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WRGCXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

1.79

-1.60

Drawdowns

WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRGCX drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRGCX and UMBHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRGCXUMBHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.56%

-1.86%

-56.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.82%

0.00%

-19.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.34%

-0.84%

-20.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

Volatility

WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRGCXUMBHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.06%

30.30%

-10.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.95%

30.30%

+12.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.74%

30.30%

+4.44%

WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRGCX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison

WRGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.08%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UMBHX
Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WRGCX
Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund
11.08%12.50%23.68%9.47%9.84%63.80%12.83%9.29%23.45%13.88%7.73%18.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, WRGCX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRGCX and UMBHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer