WRGCX vs. UMBHX
WRGCX (Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WRGCX charges 1.89%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WRGCX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 11.03%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
UMBHX
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WRGCX Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund | -0.41% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRGCX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRGCX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
WRGCX
UMBHX
WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund (WRGCX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WRGCX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WRGCX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 1.79 | -1.60 |
Drawdowns
WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRGCX drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRGCX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRGCX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.56% | -1.86% | -56.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.82% | 0.00% | -19.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.34% | -0.84% | -20.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | — | — |
Volatility
WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRGCX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.06% | 30.30% | -10.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.95% | 30.30% | +12.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.74% | 30.30% | +4.44% |
WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRGCX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
WRGCX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
WRGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.08%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WRGCX Delaware Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund | 11.08% | 12.50% | 23.68% | 9.47% | 9.84% | 63.80% | 12.83% | 9.29% | 23.45% | 13.88% | 7.73% | 18.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, WRGCX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for WRGCX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer