PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WREE.L vs. LOGS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WREE.L vs. LOGS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Strategic Metals and Rare Earths Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (WREE.L) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WREE.L is traded in GBp, while LOGS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LOGS.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WREE.L achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly lower than LOGS.DE's 28.83% return.


WREE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-17.91%
YTD
7.84%
6M
16.54%
1Y
89.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LOGS.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
28.83%
6M
30.19%
1Y
60.69%
3Y*
24.22%
5Y*
21.30%
10Y*
13.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WREE.L vs. LOGS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WREE.L and LOGS.DE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024

0.34

The correlation between WREE.L and LOGS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WREE.L vs. LOGS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WREE.L
WREE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WREE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WREE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WREE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
WREE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WREE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

LOGS.DE
LOGS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LOGS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOGS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOGS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LOGS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOGS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WREE.L vs. LOGS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Strategic Metals and Rare Earths Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (WREE.L) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WREE.LLOGS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.60

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

8.79

-5.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

29.00

-21.28

WREE.L vs. LOGS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WREE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the LOGS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WREE.L and LOGS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WREE.L vs. LOGS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WREE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.50%, smaller than the maximum LOGS.DE drawdown of -53.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WREE.L and LOGS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WREE.LLOGS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.50%

-53.78%

+26.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.87%

-6.87%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.29%

-5.53%

-13.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.25%

-17.58%

+7.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.56%

2.09%

+9.47%

Volatility

WREE.L vs. LOGS.DE - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Strategic Metals and Rare Earths Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (WREE.L) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) at 6.05%. This indicates that WREE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOGS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WREE.LLOGS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.90%

6.05%

+6.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.74%

13.40%

+17.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.33%

17.33%

+39.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5,411.89%

21.36%

+5,390.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5,411.89%

23.53%

+5,388.36%

WREE.L vs. LOGS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WREE.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LOGS.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

WREE.L vs. LOGS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WREE.L nor LOGS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WREE.L and LOGS.DE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WREE.L.

WREE.L is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while LOGS.DE is Energy Equities. WREE.L tracks WisdomTree Strategic Metals and Rare Earths Miners Index, while LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WREE.L and 0.30% for LOGS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WREE.L and LOGS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer