PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRAIX vs. CRIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WRAIX vs. CRIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund (CRIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRAIX achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly lower than CRIHX's 7.80% return.


WRAIX

1D
0.67%
1M
0.87%
6M
3.37%
YTD
4.66%
1Y
8.15%
3Y*
8.15%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
5.40%
ALL TIME*
4.17%

CRIHX

1D
0.22%
1M
-3.32%
6M
3.79%
YTD
7.80%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WRAIX vs. CRIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WRAIX
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund
4.66%9.13%7.74%7.73%-3.41%6.52%1.04%12.34%-2.67%9.75%
CRIHX
CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund
7.80%-1.55%17.72%6.06%-4.24%5.91%20.44%12.95%-8.43%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between WRAIX and CRIHX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2016

0.61

The correlation between WRAIX and CRIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRAIX vs. CRIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WRAIX
WRAIX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
WRAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
WRAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

CRIHX
CRIHX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CRIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CRIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WRAIX vs. CRIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund (CRIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WRAIXCRIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.17

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.04

4.19

+1.85

WRAIX vs. CRIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the CRIHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRAIX and CRIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WRAIX vs. CRIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRAIX drawdown since its inception was -15.44%, smaller than the maximum CRIHX drawdown of -21.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRAIX and CRIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRAIXCRIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.44%

-21.33%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.03%

-9.07%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

-15.87%

+10.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.24%

-15.87%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.32%

+7.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.96%

-4.10%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

3.26%

-2.05%

Volatility

WRAIX vs. CRIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) is 1.40%, while CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund (CRIHX) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that WRAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRAIXCRIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

3.92%

-2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.11%

10.79%

-5.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.26%

14.37%

-8.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.52%

11.27%

-4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.76%

11.21%

-4.45%

WRAIX vs. CRIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRAIX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CRIHX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

WRAIX vs. CRIHX - Dividend Comparison

WRAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while CRIHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRIHX
CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%8.11%2.32%1.55%0.75%8.83%0.03%1.75%0.24%0.00%0.00%
WRAIX
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund
0.17%0.17%1.47%1.31%2.77%0.52%1.98%1.15%1.25%1.15%0.30%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


WRAIX and CRIHX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRIHX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to WRAIX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRAIX dropped -15.44% vs CRIHX's -21.33%.

WRAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRAIX and CRIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer