WRAIX vs. BIVIX
WRAIX (Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund) and BIVIX (Invenomic Fund Institutional Class) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, WRAIX returned 5.32%/yr vs 13.32%/yr for BIVIX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WRAIX charges 1.24%/yr vs 3.17%/yr for BIVIX.
Performance
WRAIX vs. BIVIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRAIX achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly higher than BIVIX's -6.05% return.
WRAIX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 4.24%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 8.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.32%
- 10Y*
- 5.38%
BIVIX
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 7.92%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -6.05%
- 1Y
- -2.49%
- 3Y*
- -1.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- —
WRAIX vs. BIVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund | 4.24% | 9.13% | 7.74% | 7.73% | -3.41% | 6.52% | 1.04% | 12.34% | -2.67% | 3.87% |
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | -6.05% | 4.63% | -8.81% | 16.80% | 50.01% | 63.81% | 11.46% | 11.59% | 3.68% | 8.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRAIX and BIVIX is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.05 |
The correlation between WRAIX and BIVIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRAIX vs. BIVIX — Risk / Return Rank
WRAIX
BIVIX
WRAIX vs. BIVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WRAIX | BIVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.01 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | -0.13 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | -0.35 | +6.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WRAIX vs. BIVIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRAIX drawdown since its inception was -15.44%, smaller than the maximum BIVIX drawdown of -26.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRAIX and BIVIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRAIX | BIVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.44% | -26.95% | +11.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.03% | -26.95% | +21.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.03% | -26.95% | +21.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.24% | -26.95% | +17.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -11.96% | +11.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -6.03% | +4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 9.85% | -8.64% |
Volatility
WRAIX vs. BIVIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) is 2.00%, while Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) has a volatility of 17.20%. This indicates that WRAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRAIX | BIVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 17.20% | -15.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.16% | 26.03% | -20.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.23% | 29.79% | -23.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.53% | 18.31% | -11.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.76% | 18.02% | -11.26% |
WRAIX vs. BIVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRAIX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than BIVIX's 3.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
WRAIX vs. BIVIX - Dividend Comparison
WRAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than BIVIX's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | 2.34% | 2.20% | 3.95% | 20.15% | 27.91% | 16.08% | 3.15% | 3.19% | 4.79% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund | 0.17% | 0.17% | 1.47% | 1.31% | 2.77% | 0.52% | 1.98% | 1.15% | 1.25% | 1.15% | 0.30% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WRAIX and BIVIX have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIVIX has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to WRAIX (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRAIX dropped -15.44% vs BIVIX's -26.95%.
WRAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WRAIX and BIVIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer