PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRAIX vs. ABRVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WRAIX vs. ABRVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRAIX achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly lower than ABRVX's 9.84% return. Over the past 10 years, WRAIX has underperformed ABRVX with an annualized return of 5.40%, while ABRVX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.76% annualized return.


WRAIX

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.64%
YTD
3.69%
6M
4.16%
1Y
8.07%
3Y*
8.65%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
5.40%

ABRVX

1D
0.24%
1M
4.24%
YTD
9.84%
6M
9.55%
1Y
21.31%
3Y*
8.08%
5Y*
1.15%
10Y*
6.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRAIX vs. ABRVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WRAIX
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund
3.69%9.13%7.74%7.73%-3.41%6.52%1.04%12.34%-2.67%9.75%
ABRVX
ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund
9.84%-0.70%11.76%8.89%-27.36%15.95%49.42%9.08%-3.28%9.50%

Correlation

The correlation between WRAIX and ABRVX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.62

The correlation between WRAIX and ABRVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRAIX vs. ABRVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRAIX
WRAIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
WRAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
WRAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ABRVX
ABRVX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ABRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ABRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRAIX vs. ABRVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WRAIXABRVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

2.34

-0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

3.36

-1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.44

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

3.14

-1.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.03

11.22

-4.19

WRAIX vs. ABRVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the ABRVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRAIX and ABRVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WRAIXABRVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.34

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.09

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.50

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.49

+0.19

Drawdowns

WRAIX vs. ABRVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRAIX drawdown since its inception was -15.44%, smaller than the maximum ABRVX drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRAIX and ABRVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRAIXABRVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.44%

-29.71%

+14.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.03%

-6.93%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

-20.65%

+15.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.24%

-29.71%

+20.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.44%

-29.71%

+14.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-4.09%

+4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-11.39%

+9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.94%

-0.75%

Volatility

WRAIX vs. ABRVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) is 1.48%, while ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that WRAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABRVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRAIXABRVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

2.62%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.71%

6.61%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.92%

9.41%

-3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.47%

12.50%

-6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.73%

13.66%

-6.93%

WRAIX vs. ABRVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRAIX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than ABRVX's 1.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

WRAIX vs. ABRVX - Dividend Comparison

WRAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than ABRVX's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABRVX
ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund
1.15%1.26%2.07%0.00%0.00%8.33%24.49%0.80%3.95%3.26%1.29%0.00%
WRAIX
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund
0.17%0.17%1.47%1.31%2.77%0.52%1.98%1.15%1.25%1.15%0.30%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


WRAIX and ABRVX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABRVX has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to WRAIX (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRAIX dropped -15.44% vs ABRVX's -29.71%.

ABRVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRAIX and ABRVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer