WQDV.L vs. WMVG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WQDV.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and WMVG.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - WQDV.L tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index while WMVG.L tracks the MSCI World Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WQDV.L returned 11.70%/yr vs 5.05%/yr for WMVG.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WQDV.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for WMVG.L.

Performance

WQDV.L vs. WMVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

WQDV.L is traded in USD, while WMVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WMVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WQDV.L achieves a 14.25% return, which is significantly higher than WMVG.L's 1.06% return.

WQDV.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 6.39%
• YTD: 14.25%
• 6M: 15.58%
• 1Y: 30.82%
• 3Y*: 19.42%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: —

WMVG.L

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 2.68%
• 1Y: 1.83%
• 3Y*: 12.61%
• 5Y*: 5.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WQDV.L vs. WMVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
WQDV.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	14.25%	24.15%	9.88%	17.14%	-6.91%	15.95%	0.01%	12.63%
WMVG.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)	1.07%	17.31%	12.58%	13.00%	-18.11%	15.90%	1.73%	11.55%

Correlation

The correlation between WQDV.L and WMVG.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019	0.73

The correlation between WQDV.L and WMVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WQDV.L vs. WMVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WQDV.L	WMVG.L
Technology	35.2%	20.1%
Financial Services	16.9%	14.0%
Healthcare	14.4%	13.8%
Industrials	11.1%	9.2%
Communication Services	5.4%	12.1%
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	5.6%
Energy	4.1%	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	10.9%
Utilities	3.1%	8.0%
Real Estate	1.3%	0.7%
Basic Materials	0.7%	1.1%

Return for Risk

WQDV.L vs. WMVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WQDV.L

WQDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
WQDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
WQDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
WQDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
WQDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
WQDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

WMVG.L

WMVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 15
WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
WMVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
WMVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 14
WMVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
WMVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WQDV.L vs. WMVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WQDV.L	WMVG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	0.18	+2.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	0.31	+3.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.04	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.95	0.27	+3.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.66	0.63	+14.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WQDV.L vs. WMVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WQDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WQDV.L and WMVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WQDV.L	WMVG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	0.18	+2.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.34	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.41	+0.29

Drawdowns

WQDV.L vs. WMVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WQDV.L drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum WMVG.L drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQDV.L and WMVG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WQDV.L	WMVG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.13%	-36.20%	+3.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.76%	-6.70%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.08%	-11.59%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.26%	-32.15%	+10.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-3.63%	+3.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.28%	-7.09%	+2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	2.90%	-0.80%

Volatility

WQDV.L vs. WMVG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) at 2.32%. This indicates that WQDV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WQDV.L	WMVG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	2.32%	+1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.03%	6.88%	+2.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.74%	10.17%	+1.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.88%	14.83%	-0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.69%	16.81%	-2.12%

WQDV.L vs. WMVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQDV.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than WMVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

WQDV.L vs. WMVG.L - Dividend Comparison

WQDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while WMVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WMVG.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WQDV.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	2.16%	2.31%	2.58%	2.78%	2.95%	2.75%	2.81%	3.01%	3.28%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WQDV.L and WMVG.L in my portfolio?

WQDV.L and WMVG.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WQDV.L or WMVG.L?

On fees, WMVG.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WQDV.L or WMVG.L?

WMVG.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDV.L.

What is the main difference between WQDV.L and WMVG.L?

WQDV.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while WMVG.L tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WQDV.L and 0.35% for WMVG.L.