WQDV.L vs. SPXS.L
WQDV.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and SPXS.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - WQDV.L tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index while SPXS.L tracks the Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WQDV.L returned 12.21%/yr vs -54.94%/yr for SPXS.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WQDV.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXS.L.
Performance
WQDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WQDV.L achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS.L's 10.20% return.
WQDV.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 13.77%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.44%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- —
SPXS.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- YTD
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- -98.78%
- 3Y*
- -74.11%
- 5Y*
- -54.94%
- 10Y*
- -27.39%
WQDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WQDV.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 15.40% | 24.16% | 9.75% | 17.23% | -6.95% | 16.00% | -0.07% | 22.73% | -7.80% | 8.45% |
SPXS.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.20% | -98.82% | 25.56% | 27.00% | -18.53% | 29.64% | 17.89% | 30.86% | -5.19% | 11.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQDV.L and SPXS.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between WQDV.L and SPXS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQDV.L vs. SPXS.L — Risk / Return Rank
WQDV.L
SPXS.L
WQDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WQDV.L | SPXS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.52 | +0.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | -1.00 | +4.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.72 | -1.23 | +14.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WQDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQDV.L drawdown since its inception was -33.16%, smaller than the maximum SPXS.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQDV.L and SPXS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQDV.L | SPXS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.16% | -99.07% | +65.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.79% | -99.07% | +91.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -99.07% | +85.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.24% | -99.07% | +77.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -98.90% | +98.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -7.67% | +3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 80.57% | -78.46% |
Volatility
WQDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) at 2.73%. This indicates that WQDV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQDV.L | SPXS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 2.73% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 9.24% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.95% | 99.43% | -87.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 47.13% | -33.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 35.27% | -20.64% |
WQDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQDV.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXS.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Dividend Comparison
WQDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while SPXS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXS.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WQDV.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.14% | 2.31% | 2.58% | 2.78% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.81% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WQDV.L and SPXS.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDV.L.
WQDV.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while SPXS.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WQDV.L and 0.05% for SPXS.L.
Find the right allocation for WQDV.L and SPXS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer