PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WQDS.L vs. SPXS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WQDS.L vs. SPXS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WQDS.L is traded in GBp, while SPXS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPXS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WQDS.L achieves a 15.20% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS.L's 9.88% return.


WQDS.L

1D
-1.09%
1M
-0.53%
6M
13.28%
YTD
15.20%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*

SPXS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.81%
6M
9.42%
YTD
9.88%
1Y
-98.79%
3Y*
-74.39%
5Y*
-54.77%
10Y*
-27.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WQDS.L vs. SPXS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
15.20%15.54%11.68%10.80%4.05%17.47%-3.37%18.77%-5.32%-20.48%
SPXS.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
9.88%-98.91%27.76%20.65%-8.84%30.87%14.43%25.88%0.43%5.01%

Correlation

The correlation between WQDS.L and SPXS.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.77

The correlation between WQDS.L and SPXS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WQDS.L vs. SPXS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WQDS.L
WQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXS.L
SPXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WQDS.L vs. SPXS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WQDS.LSPXS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

0.52

+0.97

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

-1.00

+5.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.36

-1.23

+16.59

WQDS.L vs. SPXS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WQDS.L and SPXS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WQDS.L vs. SPXS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WQDS.L drawdown since its inception was -30.62%, smaller than the maximum SPXS.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQDS.L and SPXS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WQDS.LSPXS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.62%

-99.07%

+68.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.75%

-99.07%

+92.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.93%

-99.07%

+84.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.93%

-99.07%

+84.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-98.92%

+97.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.99%

-7.34%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

80.59%

-78.77%

Volatility

WQDS.L vs. SPXS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) have volatilities of 2.80% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WQDS.LSPXS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

2.88%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

9.25%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

99.46%

-88.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.60%

46.95%

-35.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.96%

35.32%

-20.36%

WQDS.L vs. SPXS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQDS.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXS.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

WQDS.L vs. SPXS.L - Dividend Comparison

WQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while SPXS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
SPXS.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.15%2.34%2.56%2.86%2.97%2.70%3.03%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


WQDS.L and SPXS.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDS.L.

WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while SPXS.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WQDS.L and 0.05% for SPXS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WQDS.L and SPXS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer