PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WQDS.L vs. IBTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WQDS.L vs. IBTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WQDS.L is traded in GBp, while IBTA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBTA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WQDS.L achieves a 15.10% return, which is significantly higher than IBTA.L's 0.86% return.


WQDS.L

1D
0.14%
1M
5.99%
YTD
15.10%
6M
15.33%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
13.76%
10Y*

IBTA.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.05%
YTD
0.86%
6M
0.22%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
1.61%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WQDS.L vs. IBTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
15.10%16.53%12.46%11.62%4.66%18.72%-2.56%19.86%-1.40%2.29%
IBTA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.83%-2.20%5.93%-1.06%7.69%0.30%0.11%-0.36%7.45%-5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between WQDS.L and IBTA.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.19

The correlation between WQDS.L and IBTA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (5 years) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WQDS.L vs. IBTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WQDS.L
WQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTA.L
IBTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WQDS.L vs. IBTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WQDS.LIBTA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.12

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

0.85

+4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.20

2.34

+15.87

WQDS.L vs. IBTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WQDS.L and IBTA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WQDS.LIBTA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

0.69

+2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

0.36

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.13

+0.67

Drawdowns

WQDS.L vs. IBTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WQDS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, which is greater than IBTA.L's maximum drawdown of -18.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQDS.L and IBTA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WQDS.LIBTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

-18.45%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.75%

-5.21%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.93%

-9.27%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.93%

-16.67%

+1.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.85%

+7.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-8.99%

+6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.89%

-0.07%

Volatility

WQDS.L vs. IBTA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) at 1.65%. This indicates that WQDS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WQDS.LIBTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

1.65%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

4.90%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

6.36%

+4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.58%

8.23%

+3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

8.51%

+4.71%

WQDS.L vs. IBTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQDS.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTA.L's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

WQDS.L vs. IBTA.L - Dividend Comparison

WQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while IBTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBTA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.90%3.12%3.24%3.55%3.56%3.71%3.84%3.98%4.19%1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


WQDS.L and IBTA.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDS.L.

WQDS.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IBTA.L is Government Bonds. WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while IBTA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WQDS.L and 0.07% for IBTA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WQDS.L and IBTA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer