PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WQDS.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WQDS.L vs. CSP1.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WQDS.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WQDS.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WQDS.L returned 13.76%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for CSP1.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WQDS.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.

Performance

WQDS.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WQDS.L achieves a 15.10% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's 10.55% return.

WQDS.L

1D
0.14%
1M
7.68%
YTD
15.10%
6M
15.33%
1Y
33.20%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
13.76%
10Y*
—

CSP1.L

1D
0.05%
1M
4.54%
YTD
10.55%
6M
9.89%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WQDS.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		15.10%16.53%12.46%11.62%4.66%18.72%-2.56%19.86%-1.40%2.29%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF		10.55%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%13.65%26.42%0.01%5.65%

Correlation

The correlation between WQDS.L and CSP1.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.82

The correlation between WQDS.L and CSP1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WQDS.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
WQDS.L
CSP1.L

Technology

35.2%
38.0%

Financial Services

16.9%
11.3%

Healthcare

14.4%
8.4%

Industrials

11.1%
7.9%

Communication Services

5.4%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%
9.9%

Energy

4.1%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.7%

Utilities

3.1%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.9%

Basic Materials

0.7%
1.7%

Technology

WQDS.L
35.2%
CSP1.L
38.0%

Financial Services

WQDS.L
16.9%
CSP1.L
11.3%

Healthcare

WQDS.L
14.4%
CSP1.L
8.4%

Industrials

WQDS.L
11.1%
CSP1.L
7.9%

Communication Services

WQDS.L
5.4%
CSP1.L
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

WQDS.L
4.3%
CSP1.L
9.9%

Energy

WQDS.L
4.1%
CSP1.L
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

WQDS.L
3.6%
CSP1.L
4.7%

Utilities

WQDS.L
3.1%
CSP1.L
2.2%

Real Estate

WQDS.L
1.3%
CSP1.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

WQDS.L
0.7%
CSP1.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF

Often compared with WQDS.L:
WQDS.L vs. PSRE.LWQDS.L vs. FGQD.LWQDS.L vs. VGWD.DEWQDS.L vs. TDGB.LWQDS.L vs. NQSE.DEWQDS.L vs. IS3Q.DEWQDS.L vs. QQMG
Often compared with CSP1.L:
CSP1.L vs. CSPX.LCSP1.L vs. VUAG.LCSP1.L vs. SPYCSP1.L vs. IUSA.LCSP1.L vs. VUAA.LCSP1.L vs. SPY5.LCSP1.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

WQDS.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WQDS.L
WQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WQDS.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WQDS.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.19
2.73

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.56
3.66

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.51

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

4.07

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.20

14.99

+3.21

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WQDS.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WQDS.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WQDS.LCSP1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

2.73

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

1.04

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.03

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

1.09

-0.29

Drawdowns

WQDS.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WQDS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, roughly equal to the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQDS.L and CSP1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WQDS.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

-25.48%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.75%

-7.12%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.93%

-20.77%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.93%

-20.77%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-25.48%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.24%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-3.32%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.94%

-0.12%

Volatility

WQDS.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that WQDS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WQDS.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

2.62%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

7.16%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

10.62%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.58%

14.31%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

15.57%

-2.35%

WQDS.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQDS.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

WQDS.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

WQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		2.90%3.12%3.24%3.55%3.56%3.71%3.84%3.98%4.19%1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

WQDS.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDS.L.

WQDS.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WQDS.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WQDS.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer