PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WQDS.L vs. ACWI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WQDS.L vs. ACWI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WQDS.L is traded in GBp, while ACWI.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ACWI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WQDS.L achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI.L's 10.26% return.


WQDS.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.77%
6M
13.70%
YTD
15.40%
1Y
26.94%
3Y*
16.21%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.29%

ACWI.L

1D
0.42%
1M
-2.64%
6M
8.82%
YTD
10.26%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
11.22%
10Y*
11.98%
ALL TIME*
11.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WQDS.L vs. ACWI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
15.40%15.54%11.68%10.80%4.05%17.47%-3.37%18.77%-5.32%-20.48%
ACWI.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
10.26%14.32%19.66%15.59%-8.59%20.16%11.93%22.61%-4.50%4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between WQDS.L and ACWI.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.71

The correlation between WQDS.L and ACWI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

WQDS.L vs. ACWI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WQDS.L
ACWI.L

Technology

35.8%
32.6%

Financial Services

17.5%
16.0%

Healthcare

13.3%
8.3%

Industrials

9.6%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
8.7%

Communication Services

5.0%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.7%

Energy

3.2%
3.5%

Utilities

3.0%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.6%

Basic Materials

0.9%
3.4%

Technology

WQDS.L
35.8%
ACWI.L
32.6%

Financial Services

WQDS.L
17.5%
ACWI.L
16.0%

Healthcare

WQDS.L
13.3%
ACWI.L
8.3%

Industrials

WQDS.L
9.6%
ACWI.L
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

WQDS.L
5.8%
ACWI.L
8.7%

Communication Services

WQDS.L
5.0%
ACWI.L
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

WQDS.L
4.8%
ACWI.L
4.7%

Energy

WQDS.L
3.2%
ACWI.L
3.5%

Utilities

WQDS.L
3.0%
ACWI.L
2.5%

Real Estate

WQDS.L
1.0%
ACWI.L
1.6%

Basic Materials

WQDS.L
0.9%
ACWI.L
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WQDS.L vs. ACWI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WQDS.L
WQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI.L
ACWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WQDS.L vs. ACWI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WQDS.LACWI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.37

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

3.09

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.72

11.81

+2.90

WQDS.L vs. ACWI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WQDS.L and ACWI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WQDS.L vs. ACWI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WQDS.L drawdown since its inception was -30.62%, which is greater than ACWI.L's maximum drawdown of -26.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQDS.L and ACWI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WQDS.LACWI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.62%

-26.07%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.75%

-7.05%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.93%

-20.07%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.93%

-20.07%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-2.64%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-4.38%

-4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.85%

-0.03%

Volatility

WQDS.L vs. ACWI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) is 2.74%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) has a volatility of 3.16%. This indicates that WQDS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WQDS.LACWI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

3.16%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

8.45%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.38%

11.02%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.57%

19.00%

-7.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.95%

17.61%

-2.66%

WQDS.L vs. ACWI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQDS.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

WQDS.L vs. ACWI.L - Dividend Comparison

WQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while ACWI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ACWI.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.15%2.34%2.56%2.86%2.97%2.70%3.03%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


WQDS.L and ACWI.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WQDS.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WQDS.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ACWI.L.

WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while ACWI.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WQDS.L and 0.40% for ACWI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WQDS.L and ACWI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer