WPS vs. IWM
WPS (iShares International Developed Property ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WPS is a REIT fund tracking the S&P Developed ex US Property Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WPS charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
WPS vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WPS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 17.07%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 39.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
WPS vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPS iShares International Developed Property ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -3.59% | 7.43% | -24.74% | 9.05% | -5.36% | 20.34% | -9.03% | 22.86% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 17.07% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between WPS and IWM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2007 | 0.62 |
The correlation between WPS and IWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WPS vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WPS
IWM
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
WPS
IWM
Basic Materials
WPS
-
IWM
Communication Services
WPS
-
IWM
Consumer Cyclical
WPS
-
IWM
Consumer Defensive
WPS
-
IWM
Energy
WPS
-
IWM
Financial Services
WPS
-
IWM
Healthcare
WPS
-
IWM
Industrials
WPS
-
IWM
Technology
WPS
-
IWM
Utilities
WPS
-
IWM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WPS vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
WPS
IWM
WPS vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Property ETF (WPS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WPS | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.37 | — |
Drawdowns
WPS vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WPS | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -59.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.49% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.77% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.10% | — |
Volatility
WPS vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WPS | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 19.20% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.52% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 23.04% | — |
WPS vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WPS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
WPS vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
WPS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
WPS iShares International Developed Property ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.48% | 2.38% | 2.63% | 4.36% | 2.31% | 6.81% | 4.45% | 4.31% | 5.73% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WPS and IWM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for WPS.
IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for WPS.
WPS is categorized as REIT, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. WPS tracks S&P Developed ex US Property Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for WPS and 0.19% for IWM.
Find the right allocation for WPS and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer