PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPS vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WPS vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Developed Property ETF (WPS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WPS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWM

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.52%
YTD
17.07%
6M
15.83%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPS vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WPS
iShares International Developed Property ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.59%7.43%-24.74%9.05%-5.36%20.34%-9.03%22.86%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
17.07%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between WPS and IWM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2007

0.62

The correlation between WPS and IWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WPS vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WPS
IWM

Real Estate

100.0%
5.7%

Basic Materials

-

4.5%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.1%

Energy

-

6.0%

Financial Services

-

15.8%

Healthcare

-

15.8%

Industrials

-

17.1%

Technology

-

19.5%

Utilities

-

3.0%

Real Estate

WPS
100.0%
IWM
5.7%

Basic Materials

WPS

-

IWM
4.5%

Communication Services

WPS

-

IWM
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

WPS

-

IWM
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

WPS

-

IWM
2.1%

Energy

WPS

-

IWM
6.0%

Financial Services

WPS

-

IWM
15.8%

Healthcare

WPS

-

IWM
15.8%

Industrials

WPS

-

IWM
17.1%

Technology

WPS

-

IWM
19.5%

Utilities

WPS

-

IWM
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPS vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPS

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPS vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Property ETF (WPS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WPS vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WPSIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

Drawdowns

WPS vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPSIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

Volatility

WPS vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPSIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.04%

WPS vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

WPS vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

WPS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.88%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%
WPS
iShares International Developed Property ETF
0.00%0.00%2.48%2.38%2.63%4.36%2.31%6.81%4.45%4.31%5.73%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


WPS and IWM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for WPS.

IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for WPS.

WPS is categorized as REIT, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. WPS tracks S&P Developed ex US Property Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for WPS and 0.19% for IWM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPS and IWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer