WPS vs. ACWI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares International Developed Property ETF (WPS) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI).

WPS and ACWI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WPS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed ex US Property Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2007. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008. Both WPS and ACWI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

WPS vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Developed Property ETF (WPS) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WPS vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WPS iShares International Developed Property ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.59%	7.43%	-24.74%	9.05%	-5.36%	20.34%	-9.03%	22.86%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	-2.21%	22.41%	17.45%	22.27%	-18.39%	18.66%	16.34%	26.59%	-9.19%	24.33%

Returns By Period

WPS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACWI

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: -6.11%
• YTD: -2.21%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 20.86%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 9.40%
• 10Y*: 11.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPS vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

WPS

iShares International Developed Property ETF

ACWI

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF

Return for Risk

WPS vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 75
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPS vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Property ETF (WPS) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WPS	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.39	—

Correlation

The correlation between WPS and ACWI is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

WPS vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

WPS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WPS iShares International Developed Property ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.48%	2.38%	2.63%	4.36%	2.31%	6.81%	4.45%	4.31%	5.73%	3.20%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.59%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	WPS	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-56.00%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-6.92%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-8.69%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.54%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WPS	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.05%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	17.48%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.97%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	17.08%	—