PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPM.TO vs. NFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WPM.TO vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WPM.TO is traded in CAD, while NFLX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NFLX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPM.TO achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -12.58% return. Over the past 10 years, WPM.TO has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 21.58%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.98% annualized return.


WPM.TO

1D
3.30%
1M
-14.91%
YTD
0.91%
6M
0.67%
1Y
31.15%
3Y*
40.83%
5Y*
24.07%
10Y*
21.58%

NFLX

1D
-0.96%
1M
-5.79%
YTD
-12.58%
6M
-14.40%
1Y
-31.89%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
24.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPM.TO vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WPM.TO
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.91%100.91%25.13%25.20%-1.07%3.20%39.06%47.18%-2.24%8.88%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-12.58%0.39%98.57%61.18%-47.95%11.36%63.15%15.91%51.16%44.56%

Correlation

The correlation between WPM.TO and NFLX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.09

The correlation between WPM.TO and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WPM.TO:

CA$73.85B

NFLX:

$345.34B

EPS

WPM.TO:

$3.96

NFLX:

$3.09

PE Ratio

WPM.TO:

29.36

NFLX:

25.99

PEG Ratio

WPM.TO:

0.79

NFLX:

1.03

PS Ratio

WPM.TO:

19.24

NFLX:

7.41

PB Ratio

WPM.TO:

5.71

NFLX:

11.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

WPM.TO:

$2.74B

NFLX:

$46.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WPM.TO:

$2.12B

NFLX:

$22.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

WPM.TO:

$2.37B

NFLX:

$26.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPM.TO vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPM.TO
WPM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
WPM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPM.TO vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WPM.TONFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.83

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

-0.74

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.77

-1.31

+4.08

WPM.TO vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPM.TO and NFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WPM.TO vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPM.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.21%, roughly equal to the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPM.TO and NFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPM.TONFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.21%

-81.76%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.62%

-43.79%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.62%

-43.79%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.04%

-75.15%

+36.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

-75.15%

+27.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.16%

-38.73%

+10.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.72%

-26.28%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.90%

24.73%

-12.83%

Volatility

WPM.TO vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.82% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 5.91%. This indicates that WPM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPM.TONFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.82%

5.91%

+11.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.20%

24.68%

+13.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.95%

33.23%

+11.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.46%

43.68%

-10.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.26%

42.01%

-6.75%

Dividends

WPM.TO vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

WPM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WPM.TO
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.62%0.57%1.05%1.25%1.40%1.05%1.08%1.24%1.75%1.54%1.06%1.48%

Financials

WPM.TO vs. NFLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. and Netflix, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
886.69M
12.25B
(WPM.TO) Total Revenue
(NFLX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WPM.TO vs. NFLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. and Netflix, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
77.5%
51.9%
Portfolio components
WPM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 687.49M and revenue of 886.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.

NFLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.36B and revenue of 12.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.

WPM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 665.21M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.

NFLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

WPM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 572.50M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.

NFLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a net income of 5.28B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in a net margin of 43.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WPM.TO and NFLX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPM.TO and NFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer