PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPLCX vs. HFCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WPLCX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WP Large Cap Income Plus Fund (WPLCX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPLCX achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly lower than HFCVX's 11.85% return. Over the past 10 years, WPLCX has underperformed HFCVX with an annualized return of 8.66%, while HFCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.25% annualized return.


WPLCX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.11%
YTD
10.33%
6M
9.12%
1Y
25.03%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
8.66%

HFCVX

1D
0.61%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
11.85%
6M
12.00%
1Y
22.15%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
11.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPLCX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WPLCX
WP Large Cap Income Plus Fund
10.33%16.54%19.35%25.92%-35.46%22.54%-22.55%52.10%-16.58%23.73%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
11.85%18.27%9.59%5.81%6.12%29.94%-6.39%20.84%-9.50%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between WPLCX and HFCVX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between WPLCX and HFCVX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPLCX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPLCX
WPLCX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
WPLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
WPLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCVX
HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPLCX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WP Large Cap Income Plus Fund (WPLCX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WPLCXHFCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

5.89

-3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

17.08

-10.56

WPLCX vs. HFCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the HFCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPLCX and HFCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WPLCX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPLCX drawdown since its inception was -66.21%, roughly equal to the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPLCX and HFCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPLCXHFCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.21%

-65.75%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-3.77%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.09%

-11.32%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.93%

-16.81%

-27.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.21%

-39.39%

-26.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-2.88%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-8.22%

-5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

1.30%

+2.69%

Volatility

WPLCX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison

WP Large Cap Income Plus Fund (WPLCX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) at 3.21%. This indicates that WPLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPLCXHFCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.21%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

6.99%

+7.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

9.39%

+7.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.96%

13.24%

+12.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.17%

16.46%

+15.71%

WPLCX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPLCX has a 2.33% expense ratio, which is higher than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

WPLCX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison

WPLCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HFCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
6.61%7.39%4.56%3.57%10.33%4.81%2.58%6.58%17.16%14.97%2.26%2.57%
WPLCX
WP Large Cap Income Plus Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.74%2.41%0.11%2.56%0.18%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


WPLCX and HFCVX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WPLCX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to HFCVX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WPLCX dropped -66.21% vs HFCVX's -65.75%.

HFCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPLCX and HFCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer