PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPEA.PA vs. PE500.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WPEA.PA vs. PE500.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF (WPEA.PA) and Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (PE500.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WPEA.PA having a 11.02% return and PE500.PA slightly lower at 10.83%.


WPEA.PA

1D
-0.06%
1M
3.63%
YTD
11.02%
6M
10.90%
1Y
23.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PE500.PA

1D
0.63%
1M
4.10%
YTD
10.83%
6M
10.75%
1Y
27.52%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPEA.PA vs. PE500.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WPEA.PA
iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF
11.02%6.89%14.51%
PE500.PA
Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
10.83%3.89%18.39%

Correlation

The correlation between WPEA.PA and PE500.PA is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

0.93

The correlation between WPEA.PA and PE500.PA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPEA.PA vs. PE500.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPEA.PA
WPEA.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
WPEA.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPEA.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPEA.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
WPEA.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPEA.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PE500.PA
PE500.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PE500.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPEA.PA vs. PE500.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF (WPEA.PA) and Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (PE500.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WPEA.PAPE500.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.44

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.66

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.20

14.05

+0.15

WPEA.PA vs. PE500.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPEA.PA Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the PE500.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPEA.PA and PE500.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WPEA.PAPE500.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.42

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.90

+0.13

Drawdowns

WPEA.PA vs. PE500.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPEA.PA drawdown since its inception was -21.59%, smaller than the maximum PE500.PA drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPEA.PA and PE500.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPEA.PAPE500.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.59%

-33.60%

+12.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.53%

-7.47%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

0.00%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.02%

-4.85%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.96%

-0.31%

Volatility

WPEA.PA vs. PE500.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF (WPEA.PA) is 2.59%, while Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (PE500.PA) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that WPEA.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PE500.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPEA.PAPE500.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.83%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

7.53%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

11.30%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

15.18%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

16.98%

-2.41%

WPEA.PA vs. PE500.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WPEA.PA and PE500.PA have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WPEA.PA vs. PE500.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither WPEA.PA nor PE500.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, WPEA.PA and PE500.PA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WPEA.PA and PE500.PA have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

WPEA.PA is categorized as Global Equities, while PE500.PA is S&P 500. WPEA.PA tracks MSCI World NET TR EUR Index, while PE500.PA tracks S&P 500 ESG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPEA.PA and PE500.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer