PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOSC.L vs. PRWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WOSC.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WOSC.L is traded in GBP, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


WOSC.L

1D
0.61%
1M
4.16%
YTD
14.25%
6M
14.68%
1Y
33.55%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
10.89%

PRWU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOSC.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WOSC.L
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
14.25%11.76%9.41%9.96%3.72%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%20.63%18.25%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between WOSC.L and PRWU.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.52

The correlation between WOSC.L and PRWU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

WOSC.L vs. PRWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WOSC.L
PRWU.L

Industrials

20.5%
9.9%

Financial Services

13.6%
15.8%

Technology

13.4%
27.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
10.5%

Healthcare

9.5%
10.7%

Basic Materials

8.2%
3.2%

Real Estate

8.2%
2.1%

Energy

5.6%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
6.1%

Communication Services

3.0%
8.1%

Utilities

2.8%
2.7%

Industrials

WOSC.L
20.5%
PRWU.L
9.9%

Financial Services

WOSC.L
13.6%
PRWU.L
15.8%

Technology

WOSC.L
13.4%
PRWU.L
27.0%

Consumer Cyclical

WOSC.L
10.9%
PRWU.L
10.5%

Healthcare

WOSC.L
9.5%
PRWU.L
10.7%

Basic Materials

WOSC.L
8.2%
PRWU.L
3.2%

Real Estate

WOSC.L
8.2%
PRWU.L
2.1%

Energy

WOSC.L
5.6%
PRWU.L
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

WOSC.L
4.2%
PRWU.L
6.1%

Communication Services

WOSC.L
3.0%
PRWU.L
8.1%

Utilities

WOSC.L
2.8%
PRWU.L
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOSC.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOSC.L
WOSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOSC.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WOSC.LPRWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.37

WOSC.L vs. PRWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WOSC.LPRWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

Drawdowns

WOSC.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WOSC.LPRWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

Volatility

WOSC.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WOSC.LPRWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.88%

WOSC.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOSC.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

WOSC.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WOSC.L nor PRWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WOSC.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WOSC.L.

WOSC.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while PRWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WOSC.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOSC.L and PRWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer