PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOSC.L vs. HDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WOSC.L vs. HDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) and VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOSC.L achieves a 13.10% return, which is significantly lower than HDGB.L's 32.72% return.


WOSC.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
-2.52%
6M
6.68%
YTD
13.10%
1Y
24.53%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
9.72%

HDGB.L

1D
-1.51%
1M
-13.74%
6M
14.76%
YTD
32.72%
1Y
55.48%
3Y*
-8.38%
5Y*
-12.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOSC.L vs. HDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WOSC.L
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
13.10%11.77%9.41%9.96%-8.76%6.77%
HDGB.L
VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
32.72%10.07%-28.93%-27.71%-31.76%-20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between WOSC.L and HDGB.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2021

0.65

The correlation between WOSC.L and HDGB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOSC.L vs. HDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOSC.L
WOSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

HDGB.L
HDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOSC.L vs. HDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) and VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WOSC.LHDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.81

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

4.15

+7.32

WOSC.L vs. HDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the HDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOSC.L and HDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WOSC.L vs. HDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOSC.L drawdown since its inception was -40.46%, smaller than the maximum HDGB.L drawdown of -80.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOSC.L and HDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WOSC.LHDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.46%

-80.00%

+39.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-30.53%

+22.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-63.35%

+41.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.44%

-80.00%

+58.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.96%

-59.70%

+55.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.89%

-51.61%

+39.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

13.34%

-11.21%

Volatility

WOSC.L vs. HDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) is 4.33%, while VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HDGB.L) has a volatility of 10.38%. This indicates that WOSC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WOSC.LHDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

10.38%

-6.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

27.41%

-17.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.24%

39.12%

-25.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.35%

34.53%

-14.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.74%

34.61%

-11.87%

WOSC.L vs. HDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOSC.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGB.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

WOSC.L vs. HDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WOSC.L nor HDGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WOSC.L and HDGB.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WOSC.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WOSC.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HDGB.L.

WOSC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while HDGB.L is Hydrogen Economy. WOSC.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while HDGB.L tracks MVIS Global Hydrogen Economy ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WOSC.L and 0.55% for HDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOSC.L and HDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer