PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDGB.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDGB.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HDGB.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDGB.L achieves a 35.57% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 10.48% return.


HDGB.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
-11.66%
6M
18.47%
YTD
35.57%
1Y
59.95%
3Y*
-6.65%
5Y*
-12.57%
10Y*

TDGB.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.93%
6M
9.00%
YTD
10.48%
1Y
27.97%
3Y*
20.99%
5Y*
18.10%
10Y*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDGB.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HDGB.L
VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF
35.57%10.07%-28.93%-27.71%-31.76%-20.01%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
10.48%30.90%10.66%9.04%22.49%10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HDGB.L and TDGB.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2021

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between HDGB.L and TDGB.L has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDGB.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDGB.L
HDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDGB.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HDGB.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDGB.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.56

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

5.97

-3.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.71

19.47

-14.76

HDGB.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDGB.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDGB.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDGB.L drawdown since its inception was -80.00%, which is greater than TDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -32.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGB.L and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDGB.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.00%

-32.94%

-47.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.04%

-4.66%

-24.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.35%

-12.42%

-50.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.00%

-12.42%

-67.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.84%

-0.57%

-58.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.60%

-4.89%

-46.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.19%

1.43%

+11.76%

Volatility

HDGB.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HDGB.L) has a higher volatility of 10.35% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.45%. This indicates that HDGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDGB.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.35%

2.45%

+7.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.35%

7.23%

+20.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.10%

9.33%

+29.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.53%

11.44%

+23.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.61%

13.67%

+20.94%

HDGB.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDGB.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDGB.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

HDGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDGB.L
VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.15%3.50%4.26%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%4.38%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDGB.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDGB.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDGB.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HDGB.L.

HDGB.L tracks VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for HDGB.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDGB.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer