WOSC.L vs. ACWD.L
WOSC.L (SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) and ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds from State Street - WOSC.L tracks the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD while ACWD.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WOSC.L returned 10.89%/yr vs 13.49%/yr for ACWD.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WOSC.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ACWD.L.
Performance
WOSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WOSC.L is traded in GBP, while ACWD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOSC.L achieves a 14.25% return, which is significantly higher than ACWD.L's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, WOSC.L has underperformed ACWD.L with an annualized return of 10.89%, while ACWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.49% annualized return.
WOSC.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 6M
- 14.68%
- 1Y
- 33.55%
- 3Y*
- 14.89%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
ACWD.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 12.23%
- 1Y
- 30.23%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
WOSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOSC.L SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 14.25% | 11.76% | 9.41% | 9.96% | -8.76% | 16.26% | 12.23% | 22.09% | -9.72% | 11.06% |
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 11.99% | 14.08% | 19.81% | 16.16% | -8.66% | 19.89% | 12.50% | 21.02% | -4.51% | 13.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between WOSC.L and ACWD.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2013 | 0.82 |
The correlation between WOSC.L and ACWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
WOSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WOSC.L
ACWD.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
WOSC.L
ACWD.L
Financial Services
WOSC.L
ACWD.L
Technology
WOSC.L
ACWD.L
Consumer Cyclical
WOSC.L
ACWD.L
Healthcare
WOSC.L
ACWD.L
Basic Materials
WOSC.L
ACWD.L
Real Estate
WOSC.L
ACWD.L
Energy
WOSC.L
ACWD.L
Consumer Defensive
WOSC.L
ACWD.L
Communication Services
WOSC.L
ACWD.L
Utilities
WOSC.L
ACWD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WOSC.L vs. ACWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
WOSC.L
ACWD.L
WOSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WOSC.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 4.38 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.37 | 16.69 | -0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WOSC.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 2.50 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.88 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.87 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.84 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
WOSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOSC.L drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, which is greater than ACWD.L's maximum drawdown of -25.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOSC.L and ACWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WOSC.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.13% | -25.57% | -10.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -6.87% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.43% | -18.26% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.43% | -18.26% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.13% | -25.57% | -10.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.33% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -3.56% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.81% | +0.23% |
Volatility
WOSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) is 3.44%, while SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that WOSC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WOSC.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 3.71% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 9.35% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 12.02% | +0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 14.27% | +1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 15.40% | +5.48% |
WOSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WOSC.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
WOSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WOSC.L nor ACWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WOSC.L and ACWD.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WOSC.L.
WOSC.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WOSC.L and 0.12% for ACWD.L.
Find the right allocation for WOSC.L and ACWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer