PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WNTR vs. TSMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WNTR vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WNTR achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 37.92% return.


WNTR

1D
6.01%
1M
37.47%
YTD
10.46%
6M
14.06%
1Y
97.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMY

1D
1.49%
1M
7.51%
YTD
37.92%
6M
40.03%
1Y
79.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WNTR vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WNTR and TSMY is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WNTR vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMY
TSMY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WNTR vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WNTRTSMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

5.15

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

18.62

-12.78

WNTR vs. TSMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WNTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the TSMY Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WNTR and TSMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WNTR vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WNTR drawdown since its inception was -42.65%, which is greater than TSMY's maximum drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNTR and TSMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WNTRTSMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.65%

-31.15%

-11.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.65%

-15.50%

-27.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.88%

-4.49%

-5.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.93%

-5.44%

-15.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.70%

4.28%

+12.42%

Volatility

WNTR vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a higher volatility of 17.54% compared to YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) at 13.62%. This indicates that WNTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WNTRTSMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.54%

13.62%

+3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.99%

25.04%

+20.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.83%

31.17%

+21.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.10%

33.92%

+19.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.10%

33.92%

+19.18%

WNTR vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

WNTR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

WNTR vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison

WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 96.66%, more than TSMY's 50.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
50.28%56.76%13.71%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
96.66%58.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WNTR and TSMY have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (17.54%) compared to TSMY (13.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WNTR dropped -42.65% vs TSMY's -31.15%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 97.02% vs 79.40% for TSMY. On fees, TSMY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSMY has been the lower-risk option at 13.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 97.02% return vs 79.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 96.66%, compared with 50.28% for TSMY.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WNTR and 0.99% for TSMY.

TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WNTR and TSMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer