PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WNTR vs. PLTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WNTR vs. PLTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WNTR achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly higher than PLTY's -26.92% return.


WNTR

1D
2.49%
1M
29.67%
YTD
4.20%
6M
8.46%
1Y
82.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTY

1D
-2.42%
1M
-12.09%
YTD
-26.92%
6M
-32.83%
1Y
-14.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WNTR vs. PLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WNTR and PLTY is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WNTR vs. PLTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTY
PLTY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WNTR vs. PLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WNTRPLTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.97

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

-0.41

+2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.97

-0.79

+5.76

WNTR vs. PLTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WNTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the PLTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WNTR and PLTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WNTR vs. PLTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WNTR drawdown since its inception was -42.65%, which is greater than PLTY's maximum drawdown of -36.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNTR and PLTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WNTRPLTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.65%

-36.62%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.65%

-36.62%

-6.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.99%

-36.62%

+21.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.96%

-13.27%

-7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.80%

19.00%

-2.20%

Volatility

WNTR vs. PLTY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) have volatilities of 16.94% and 16.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WNTRPLTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.94%

16.40%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.74%

32.73%

+13.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.52%

43.35%

+9.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.92%

52.67%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.92%

52.67%

+0.25%

WNTR vs. PLTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

WNTR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

WNTR vs. PLTY - Dividend Comparison

WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.47%, less than PLTY's 125.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PLTY
YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF
125.34%112.44%7.85%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
102.47%58.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WNTR and PLTY have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (16.94%) compared to PLTY (16.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WNTR dropped -42.65% vs PLTY's -36.62%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 82.67% vs -14.92% for PLTY. On fees, PLTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, PLTY has been the lower-risk option at 16.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 82.67% return vs -14.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

PLTY has the higher dividend yield at 125.34%, compared with 102.47% for WNTR.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WNTR and 0.99% for PLTY.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WNTR and PLTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer