WNTR vs. MSTW
WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and MSTW (Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.97, they often move in opposite directions. WNTR charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MSTW.
Performance
WNTR vs. MSTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WNTR achieves a -7.49% return, which is significantly higher than MSTW's -23.56% return.
WNTR
- 1D
- 4.50%
- 1M
- 25.47%
- YTD
- -7.49%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 73.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTW
- 1D
- -8.54%
- 1M
- -36.78%
- YTD
- -23.56%
- 6M
- -41.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WNTR vs. MSTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -7.49% | 100.09% |
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | -23.56% | -71.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between WNTR and MSTW is -0.97, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | -0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WNTR vs. MSTW — Risk / Return Rank
WNTR
MSTW
WNTR vs. MSTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WNTR | MSTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WNTR | MSTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | -0.94 | +1.61 |
Drawdowns
WNTR vs. MSTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WNTR drawdown since its inception was -42.65%, smaller than the maximum MSTW drawdown of -81.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNTR and MSTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WNTR | MSTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.65% | -81.85% | +39.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.53% | -78.15% | +53.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -54.49% | +33.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.02% | — | — |
Volatility
WNTR vs. MSTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WNTR | MSTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.83% | 89.01% | -38.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.42% | 89.01% | -36.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.42% | 89.01% | -36.59% |
WNTR vs. MSTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WNTR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
WNTR vs. MSTW - Dividend Comparison
WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 116.75%, less than MSTW's 239.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | 239.64% | 106.94% |
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 116.75% | 58.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WNTR and MSTW have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSTW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.
MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 239.64%, compared with 116.75% for WNTR.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WNTR and 0.99% for MSTW.
Find the right allocation for WNTR and MSTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer