WNDU.L vs. ACWD.L
WNDU.L (SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF) and ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WNDU.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while ACWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WNDU.L returned 12.33%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for ACWD.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WNDU.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ACWD.L.
Performance
WNDU.L vs. ACWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WNDU.L having a 11.60% return and ACWD.L slightly lower at 11.54%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WNDU.L having a 12.33% annualized return and ACWD.L not far ahead at 12.65%.
WNDU.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- 1Y
- 21.80%
- 3Y*
- 21.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
ACWD.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- 21.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
WNDU.L vs. ACWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNDU.L SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF | 11.60% | 24.98% | 13.42% | 22.92% | -12.69% | 16.14% | 11.74% | 27.43% | -14.96% | 25.36% |
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 11.54% | 22.83% | 17.76% | 22.27% | -18.37% | 18.77% | 15.91% | 25.80% | -9.85% | 24.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between WNDU.L and ACWD.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016 | 0.88 |
The correlation between WNDU.L and ACWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
WNDU.L vs. ACWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WNDU.L
ACWD.L
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Industrials
WNDU.L
ACWD.L
Technology
WNDU.L
ACWD.L
Utilities
WNDU.L
ACWD.L
Communication Services
WNDU.L
ACWD.L
Consumer Cyclical
WNDU.L
ACWD.L
Financial Services
WNDU.L
ACWD.L
Consumer Defensive
WNDU.L
ACWD.L
Basic Materials
WNDU.L
ACWD.L
Energy
WNDU.L
ACWD.L
Real Estate
WNDU.L
ACWD.L
Healthcare
WNDU.L
-
ACWD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WNDU.L vs. ACWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
WNDU.L
ACWD.L
WNDU.L vs. ACWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WNDU.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WNDU.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.43 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 3.30 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 13.80 | -6.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WNDU.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.30 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.73 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.80 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.73 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
WNDU.L vs. ACWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WNDU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, which is greater than ACWD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNDU.L and ACWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WNDU.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.99% | -33.64% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -8.73% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.33% | -16.51% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.15% | -26.18% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.99% | -33.64% | -5.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -0.69% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -4.67% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.10% | +0.87% |
Volatility
WNDU.L vs. ACWD.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF (WNDU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) at 3.87%. This indicates that WNDU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WNDU.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 3.87% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 9.89% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 12.54% | +3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 15.58% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 15.85% | +1.94% |
WNDU.L vs. ACWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WNDU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
WNDU.L vs. ACWD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WNDU.L nor ACWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WNDU.L and ACWD.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WNDU.L.
WNDU.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while ACWD.L is Global Equities. WNDU.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WNDU.L and 0.12% for ACWD.L.
Find the right allocation for WNDU.L and ACWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer