WN.TO vs. IFC.TO
WN.TO (George Weston Limited) and IFC.TO (Intact Financial Corporation) are both stocks. WN.TO operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while IFC.TO operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, WN.TO returned 16.53%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for IFC.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WN.TO achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly higher than IFC.TO's 0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, WN.TO has outperformed IFC.TO with an annualized return of 16.53%, while IFC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.01% annualized return.
WN.TO
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- 9.38%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 14.90%
- 3Y*
- 31.13%
- 5Y*
- 26.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.53%
IFC.TO
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- -6.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
WN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WN.TO George Weston Limited | 9.38% | 30.61% | 42.28% | 3.27% | 20.32% | 63.23% | -1.41% | 21.63% | -12.47% | 0.91% |
IFC.TO Intact Financial Corporation | 0.86% | 11.22% | 31.00% | 6.96% | 21.06% | 11.37% | 10.01% | 45.11% | -2.83% | 12.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between WN.TO and IFC.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2006 | 0.25 |
The correlation between WN.TO and IFC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WN.TO:
CA$39.13B
IFC.TO:
CA$50.64B
WN.TO:
CA$4.55
IFC.TO:
CA$19.31
WN.TO:
22.62
IFC.TO:
14.76
WN.TO:
0.41
IFC.TO:
1.88
WN.TO:
9.64
IFC.TO:
2.63
WN.TO:
CA$64.87B
IFC.TO:
CA$26.97B
WN.TO:
CA$20.58B
IFC.TO:
CA$11.87B
WN.TO:
CA$7.04B
IFC.TO:
CA$5.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WN.TO vs. IFC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
WN.TO
IFC.TO
WN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for George Weston Limited (WN.TO) and Intact Financial Corporation (IFC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WN.TO | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.96 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | -0.29 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | -0.45 | +3.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WN.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.54%, smaller than the maximum IFC.TO drawdown of -52.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WN.TO and IFC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WN.TO | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.54% | -52.72% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -21.67% | +12.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.73% | -21.67% | +11.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.06% | -21.67% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.93% | -30.57% | +7.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -8.12% | +6.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -8.95% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 14.19% | -9.67% |
Volatility
WN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Volatility Comparison
George Weston Limited (WN.TO) and Intact Financial Corporation (IFC.TO) have volatilities of 6.51% and 6.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WN.TO | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 6.26% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.38% | 15.38% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.38% | 20.69% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 17.51% | +1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 18.57% | +0.50% |
Dividends
WN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Dividend Comparison
WN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than IFC.TO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFC.TO Intact Financial Corporation | 1.96% | 1.86% | 1.85% | 2.16% | 2.05% | 2.07% | 2.20% | 2.16% | 2.82% | 2.44% | 2.41% | 2.39% |
WN.TO George Weston Limited | 1.18% | 2.44% | 4.26% | 5.10% | 4.61% | 4.70% | 6.71% | 6.09% | 6.50% | 4.96% | 4.61% | 4.75% |
Financials
WN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between George Weston Limited and Intact Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Profitability Comparison
WN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, George Weston Limited reported a gross profit of 4.70B and revenue of 14.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
IFC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intact Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 7.30B and revenue of 7.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
WN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, George Weston Limited reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 14.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
IFC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intact Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 960.00M and revenue of 7.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.2%.
WN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, George Weston Limited reported a net income of 116.00M and revenue of 14.64B, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.
IFC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intact Financial Corporation reported a net income of 752.00M and revenue of 7.30B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WN.TO and IFC.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for WN.TO and IFC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer