PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WMVG.L vs. ISWD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WMVG.L vs. ISWD.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WMVG.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) and ISWD.L (iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - WMVG.L tracks the MSCI World Minimum Volatility while ISWD.L tracks the MSCI World Islamic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WMVG.L returned 6.15%/yr vs 13.73%/yr for ISWD.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WMVG.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ISWD.L.

Performance

WMVG.L vs. ISWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) and iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WMVG.L is traded in GBP, while ISWD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISWD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMVG.L achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than ISWD.L's 20.37% return.

WMVG.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.22%
6M
1.94%
1Y
2.85%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
—

ISWD.L

1D
0.65%
1M
11.25%
YTD
20.37%
6M
20.71%
1Y
38.83%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMVG.L vs. ISWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WMVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)		1.22%9.08%14.49%7.33%-8.31%16.96%-1.30%11.65%
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		20.37%11.58%7.85%17.25%-0.87%23.70%5.11%11.22%

Correlation

The correlation between WMVG.L and ISWD.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between WMVG.L and ISWD.L has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WMVG.L vs. ISWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
WMVG.L
ISWD.L

Technology

20.1%
42.8%

Financial Services

14.0%
0.0%

Healthcare

13.8%
10.4%

Communication Services

12.1%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
3.7%

Industrials

9.2%
12.9%

Utilities

8.0%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
6.9%

Energy

4.5%
11.6%

Basic Materials

1.1%
9.6%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.2%

Technology

WMVG.L
20.1%
ISWD.L
42.8%

Financial Services

WMVG.L
14.0%
ISWD.L
0.0%

Healthcare

WMVG.L
13.8%
ISWD.L
10.4%

Communication Services

WMVG.L
12.1%
ISWD.L
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

WMVG.L
10.9%
ISWD.L
3.7%

Industrials

WMVG.L
9.2%
ISWD.L
12.9%

Utilities

WMVG.L
8.0%
ISWD.L
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

WMVG.L
5.6%
ISWD.L
6.9%

Energy

WMVG.L
4.5%
ISWD.L
11.6%

Basic Materials

WMVG.L
1.1%
ISWD.L
9.6%

Real Estate

WMVG.L
0.7%
ISWD.L
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)

iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with WMVG.L:
WMVG.L vs. MVUS.LWMVG.L vs. PQVG.LWMVG.L vs. MVEW.LWMVG.L vs. MINV.LWMVG.L vs. VSCGXWMVG.L vs. AVGC.LWMVG.L vs. VHYD.L
Often compared with ISWD.L:
ISWD.L vs. IGDA.LISWD.L vs. SPUSISWD.L vs. HLALISWD.L vs. VOOISWD.L vs. SPWOISWD.L vs. UMMAISWD.L vs. HIWS.L

Return for Risk

WMVG.L vs. ISWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WMVG.L
WMVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
ISWD.L
ISWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMVG.L vs. ISWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) and iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WMVG.LISWD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.39
3.42

-3.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.59
4.60

-4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.63

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

7.02

-6.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.42

24.08

-22.65

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WMVG.L vs. ISWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMVG.L and ISWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WMVG.LISWD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

3.42

-3.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

1.03

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.89

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.74

-0.19

Drawdowns

WMVG.L vs. ISWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMVG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.25%, smaller than the maximum ISWD.L drawdown of -31.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMVG.L and ISWD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WMVG.LISWD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.25%

-31.52%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.99%

-5.51%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.09%

-21.00%

+11.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-21.00%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-24.90%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

0.00%

-3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-3.61%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.61%

+0.39%

Volatility

WMVG.L vs. ISWD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) is 2.29%, while iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that WMVG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WMVG.LISWD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

3.64%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.05%

8.40%

-3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.21%

11.34%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.95%

13.27%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.14%

14.33%

-2.19%

WMVG.L vs. ISWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMVG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ISWD.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

WMVG.L vs. ISWD.L - Dividend Comparison

WMVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.27%1.50%1.74%1.99%2.43%1.98%1.88%2.37%2.39%2.09%2.09%2.62%
WMVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

WMVG.L and ISWD.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WMVG.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WMVG.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISWD.L.

WMVG.L tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility, while ISWD.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WMVG.L and 0.60% for ISWD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMVG.L and ISWD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer