WMTI vs. PEPS
WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. WMTI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.
Performance
WMTI vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 10.67% return.
WMTI
- 1D
- 4.18%
- 1M
- -10.43%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEPS
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 31.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WMTI vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 2.10% | 9.78% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 10.67% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMTI and PEPS is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMTI vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank
WMTI
PEPS
WMTI vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMTI | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 1.05 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
WMTI vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and PEPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMTI | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.24% | -21.26% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.78% | -0.51% | -13.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -2.77% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility
WMTI vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMTI | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.30% | 13.06% | +15.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.30% | 18.31% | +9.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.30% | 18.31% | +9.99% |
WMTI vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMTI vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison
WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.32%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.88% | 1.00% | 0.17% |
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 21.32% | 3.36% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMTI and PEPS have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WMTI.
WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 21.32%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WMTI and 0.10% for PEPS.
Find the right allocation for WMTI and PEPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer