PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMTI vs. MEAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMTI vs. MEAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly higher than MEAR's 1.06% return.


WMTI

1D
4.18%
1M
-10.43%
YTD
2.10%
6M
-0.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEAR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.30%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
3.58%
5Y*
2.43%
10Y*
1.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMTI vs. MEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WMTI and MEAR is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMTI vs. MEAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMTI

MEAR
MEAR Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMTI vs. MEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WMTI vs. MEAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMTIMEARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.11

-0.33

Drawdowns

WMTI vs. MEAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, which is greater than MEAR's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and MEAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMTIMEARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.24%

-2.68%

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.78%

0.00%

-13.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.77%

-0.19%

-3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.11%

Volatility

WMTI vs. MEAR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMTIMEARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.30%

0.86%

+27.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.30%

0.98%

+27.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.30%

1.52%

+26.78%

WMTI vs. MEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MEAR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMTI vs. MEAR - Dividend Comparison

WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.32%, more than MEAR's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEAR
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF
2.84%2.95%3.44%3.30%0.88%0.30%0.90%1.57%1.36%1.01%0.81%0.53%
WMTI
REX WMT Growth & Income ETF
21.32%3.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMTI and MEAR have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MEAR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEAR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WMTI.

WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 21.32%, compared with 2.84% for MEAR.

WMTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while MEAR is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WMTI and 0.25% for MEAR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMTI and MEAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer