WMTI vs. MEAR
WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and MEAR (iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WMTI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while MEAR is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. WMTI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MEAR.
Performance
WMTI vs. MEAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly higher than MEAR's 1.06% return.
WMTI
- 1D
- 4.18%
- 1M
- -10.43%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEAR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
WMTI vs. MEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 2.10% | 9.78% |
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMTI and MEAR is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMTI vs. MEAR — Risk / Return Rank
WMTI
MEAR
WMTI vs. MEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMTI | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 1.11 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
WMTI vs. MEAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, which is greater than MEAR's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and MEAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMTI | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.24% | -2.68% | -14.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.78% | 0.00% | -13.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -0.19% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.11% | — |
Volatility
WMTI vs. MEAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMTI | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.30% | 0.86% | +27.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.30% | 0.98% | +27.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.30% | 1.52% | +26.78% |
WMTI vs. MEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MEAR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMTI vs. MEAR - Dividend Comparison
WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.32%, more than MEAR's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 2.84% | 2.95% | 3.44% | 3.30% | 0.88% | 0.30% | 0.90% | 1.57% | 1.36% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.53% |
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 21.32% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMTI and MEAR have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MEAR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MEAR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WMTI.
WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 21.32%, compared with 2.84% for MEAR.
WMTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while MEAR is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WMTI and 0.25% for MEAR.
Find the right allocation for WMTI and MEAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer